Subway Cleaner Who Witnessed a Platform Injury A New York appellate court recently affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Board decision disallowing a subway-station cleaner’s PTSD claim after he witnessed a woman’s...
NY PTSD Claim Fails Under Pre-Amendment Stress Standard NY PTSD Claim Fails Under Pre-Amendment Stress StandardAL Supreme Court: HR’s Role Was a Jury Question The Alabama Supreme Court, by a 5–4 vote, affirmed liability for retaliatory discharge where the evidence permitted a jury to find...
Who Made the Firing Decision? Alabama Court Upholds Retaliation Finding Who Made the Firing Decision? Alabama Court Upholds Retaliation FindingNY Bus Driver’s Crash and Arrhythmia A New York appellate court has affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Board finding that a school bus driver’s injuries and death arose out of his...
Uncertain Cardiac Sequence Does Not Defeat NY Bus Driver’s Claim Uncertain Cardiac Sequence Does Not Defeat NY Bus Driver’s ClaimIL Applies Saunders Acquiescence Exception to Footwear Rule An Illinois appellate court, in a decision not designated for full publication, has affirmed an award of benefits to an ice cream...
Safety Rule Defense Fails Where Employer Tolerated Violation Safety Rule Defense Fails Where Employer Tolerated ViolationThird Department Emphasizes Board’s Fact-Finding Authority and Strength of § 21 Presumption A workplace injury need not be witnessed to be compensable where circumstantial evidence supports the occurrence of an...
NY Court Affirms Claim Where Workplace Injury Unwitnessed but Supported by Circumstantial Evidence NY Court Affirms Claim Where Workplace Injury Unwitnessed but Supported by Circumstantial EvidenceMedical provider networks now dominate the delivery of care in workers’ compensation. In most states, the majority of medical dollars flow through them. Yet for all their ubiquity, clear evidence...
What Do Provider Networks Actually Do? WCRI Offers Some Answers What Do Provider Networks Actually Do? WCRI Offers Some AnswersWrong Legal Test Applied to Traveling Employee Reversing the circuit court and setting aside the Commission’s award of death benefits, the Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District, held that the...
Illinois Court Reverses Death Benefits Award Illinois Court Reverses Death Benefits AwardPulmonary Embolism Deemed Sole Cause; Water Aspiration Not a Substantial Factor In a divided, nonprecedential order, the New Hampshire Supreme Court affirmed the denial of death benefits where the Compensation...
NH Supreme Court Affirms CAB’s Fact-Finding Discretion in Divided Decision on Workplace Death NH Supreme Court Affirms CAB’s Fact-Finding Discretion in Divided Decision on Workplace DeathIn Teed v. Everest Campus East, LLC, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 2662 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 8, 2026), a Florida appellate court reversed summary judgment for a property manager, holding...
FL: Horizontal Immunity Requires a True Contractor–Subcontractor Relationship FL: Horizontal Immunity Requires a True Contractor–Subcontractor RelationshipIn Harris v. Tri-Tech Laboratories, LLC, 2026-Ohio-1152, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 1197 (Ohio Ct. App., 5th Dist. Mar. 31, 2026), the Fifth District affirmed dismissal of an employee’s intentional tort...
Ohio Intentional Tort Claims: Pleading the Deliberate Intent Standard Under R.C. 2745.01 Ohio Intentional Tort Claims: Pleading the Deliberate Intent Standard Under R.C. 2745.01The Supreme Court of Ohio recently held that the Industrial Commission failed to properly apply R.C. 4123.56(F) when it awarded temporary total disability (TTD) compensation to an injured nine-month school...
Ohio Supreme Court: R.C. 4123.56(F) Governs Summer TTD Claims of Nine-Month Employee Ohio Supreme Court: R.C. 4123.56(F) Governs Summer TTD Claims of Nine-Month EmployeeAL Supreme Court Bars Tort Claim Where Worker Accepted Comp Benefits In Duke v. Walmart, Inc., 2026 Ala. LEXIS 31 (Ala. Mar. 20, 2026), the Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed...
AL Supreme Court Bars Tort Claim Where Worker Accepted Comp Benefits AL Supreme Court Bars Tort Claim Where Worker Accepted Comp BenefitsCourt Finds Jury Question on Contract Formation In Antonio Munoz Aserradero, LLC v. Thomas, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 2261 (Tex. App.—Tyler Mar. 11, 2026), the Court of Appeals of Texas,...
Texas Court Affirms $4.5 Million Verdict for Worker Injured During “Try-Out” Period Texas Court Affirms $4.5 Million Verdict for Worker Injured During “Try-Out” PeriodThe Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently held that Scomed Supply, a retail seller of medical supplies, is not a “health care provider” as defined by Section 109 of the Pennsylvania...
PA Court: Medical Supplier Is Not a “Health Care Provider” Under State’s Act PA Court: Medical Supplier Is Not a “Health Care Provider” Under State’s ActState’s Highest Court Reverses Lower Court’s Ruling A sole proprietor need not notify his workers’ compensation insurer within 120 days of injury to preserve a claim under Section 311 of...
PA Sole Proprietor Need Not Notify Insurer Within 120 Days Under Section 311 PA Sole Proprietor Need Not Notify Insurer Within 120 Days Under Section 311The Statutory Employee Problem in Numerical-Minimum Cases A recent Virginia decision raises a question that courts applying workers’ compensation numerical-minimum statutes have rarely paused to examine: when subcontractor workers are...
Issue Commentary: Counting Heads or Counting Employees? Issue Commentary: Counting Heads or Counting Employees?
New Comments