Newest Articles

Jul 14, 2026

Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field

Idaho Federal Court Finds Surveillance and a Full-Duty Release Defeat Workers' Comp Retaliatory Discharge Claim The U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho recently granted summary judgment for a...

Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field
Jul 13, 2026

FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims

Risk-Exposure Evidence Alone Can Establish the Causal Link, Justices Hold Last Thursday, In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Muñiz, the Supreme Court of Florida held that a workplace assault...

FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims
Jul 8, 2026

KY Court Revives Tort Claims From Mayfield Candle Factory Tornado Deaths

Supervisors Who Allegedly Blocked Exits Fell Outside the Workers’ Comp Act’s Exclusive Remedy The Kentucky Court of Appeals has revived tort claims brought by survivors of the December 2021 tornado...

KY Court Revives Tort Claims From Mayfield Candle Factory Tornado Deaths KY Court Revives Tort Claims From Mayfield Candle Factory Tornado Deaths
Jul 7, 2026

Progressive-Injury Diagnosis, Not Initial Symptoms, Starts the Limitations Clock

MS Court Rejects Time-Bar Finding in Casino Dealer’s Shoulder Injury Case The Mississippi Court of Appeals has reversed a Workers’ Compensation Commission order dismissing a casino dealer’s shoulder injury claim...

Progressive-Injury Diagnosis, Not Initial Symptoms, Starts the Limitations Clock Progressive-Injury Diagnosis, Not Initial Symptoms, Starts the Limitations Clock

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Feb 12, 2026

NY Court Affirms COVID-19 Death Benefits Award Based on Workplace Prevalence

Yesterday, the Appellate Division, Third Department affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Board decision establishing a claim for workers’ compensation death benefits, finding that a truck driver’s death from COVID-19 was causally...

NY Court Affirms COVID-19 Death Benefits Award Based on Workplace Prevalence NY Court Affirms COVID-19 Death Benefits Award Based on Workplace Prevalence
Feb 9, 2026

Oklahoma High Court: “One Physician Change” is a Floor, Not a Ceiling

In a 6–2 decision, the Oklahoma Supreme Court held that the state’s Administrative Workers’ Compensation Act does not limit a claimant to a single change of treating physician per claim—even...

Oklahoma High Court: “One Physician Change” is a Floor, Not a Ceiling Oklahoma High Court: “One Physician Change” is a Floor, Not a Ceiling
Feb 7, 2026

Ohio Court Affirms Denial of Benefits Based on Marijuana Impairment

Employee Tests at 48 Times the Statutory Limit In Del. Rosario v. Fresh Mark Inc., 2026-Ohio-274, 2026 Ohio App. LEXIS 282 (Ct. App. 5th Dist. Jan. 29, 2026), an Ohio...

Ohio Court Affirms Denial of Benefits Based on Marijuana Impairment Ohio Court Affirms Denial of Benefits Based on Marijuana Impairment
Jan 26, 2026

Issue Commentary: Oregon Supreme Court Strikes Down Governmental Immunity Statute Under State’s Remedy Clause

Oregon Holds Immunity for State Employees Violates Constitution When Applied to Workers’ Compensation Recipients In a 5-2 decision, the Oregon Supreme Court has handed down a significant opinion addressing the...

Issue Commentary: Oregon Supreme Court Strikes Down Governmental Immunity Statute Under State’s Remedy Clause Issue Commentary: Oregon Supreme Court Strikes Down Governmental Immunity Statute Under State’s Remedy Clause
Jan 22, 2026

AZ Court: Personal Firearm Injury Did Not Arise Out of Employment

Yesterday, in Goins v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 2026 Ariz. App. LEXIS 16 (Div. 1, Jan. 21, 2026), an Arizona appellate court affirmed denial of workers' compensation benefits to an...

AZ Court: Personal Firearm Injury Did Not Arise Out of Employment AZ Court: Personal Firearm Injury Did Not Arise Out of Employment
Jan 20, 2026

Federal Inmate Injured in Prison Dog Training Program Cannot Pursue FTCA Claim

In Chandler v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6568 (D. Colo. Jan. 13, 2026), the United States District Court for the District of Colorado dismissed an inmate’s Federal Tort...

Federal Inmate Injured in Prison Dog Training Program Cannot Pursue FTCA Claim Federal Inmate Injured in Prison Dog Training Program Cannot Pursue FTCA Claim
Jan 16, 2026

CA Deputy Surgery Refusal Results in Disqualification from Disability Retirement Benefits

In Mendoza v. Board of Retirement of the Ventura County Employees’ Retirement Assn., 2025 Cal. App. LEXIS 865 (2d Dist. Dec. 3, 2025), a California appellate court affirmed denial of...

CA Deputy Surgery Refusal Results in Disqualification from Disability Retirement Benefits CA Deputy Surgery Refusal Results in Disqualification from Disability Retirement Benefits
Jan 14, 2026

NY Court Affirms Claim Abatement After Claimant’s Death

Board Exercised Discretion When Death Prevented IME and Cross-Examination on Psychiatric Injuries In Matter of Brady v. Town of Warwick, 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7401 (3d Dept. Dec. 31,...

NY Court Affirms Claim Abatement After Claimant’s Death NY Court Affirms Claim Abatement After Claimant’s Death
Jan 12, 2026

Failure to Secure Comp Insurance Proves Costly for TN Company

The Tennessee Court of Appeals has affirmed a trial court’s holding that a carpenter performing construction work on a farm property was neither a “casual employee” nor a “farm/agricultural laborer”...

Failure to Secure Comp Insurance Proves Costly for TN Company Failure to Secure Comp Insurance Proves Costly for TN Company
Jan 8, 2026

Texas Court Affirms Summary Judgment in Grain Bin Death Case

The Texas Court of Appeals, Seventh District, recently affirmed summary judgment for an employer in a wrongful death action filed by the mother of an employee who suffered fatal injuries...

Texas Court Affirms Summary Judgment in Grain Bin Death Case Texas Court Affirms Summary Judgment in Grain Bin Death Case
Jan 7, 2026

Idaho Clarifies Causation for Recurrent Injuries

The Idaho Supreme Court has reversed the Idaho Industrial Commission’s denial of benefits in a case involving a recurrent tendon tear, holding that the Commission applied an incorrect causation standard...

Idaho Clarifies Causation for Recurrent Injuries Idaho Clarifies Causation for Recurrent Injuries
Dec 29, 2025

TN Supreme Court: Product Vendor Not a “Subcontractor” Under Workers’ Comp Law

The Tennessee Supreme Court recently held that a retail store chain was not a statutory employer of a product vendor’s injured employee, reversing the state’s Court of Appeals and adopting...

TN Supreme Court: Product Vendor Not a “Subcontractor” Under Workers’ Comp Law TN Supreme Court: Product Vendor Not a “Subcontractor” Under Workers’ Comp Law

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89