Newest Articles

Mar 5, 2026

Delaware Supreme Court Reinstates IAB’s Denial of Sole Proprietor Coverage

In Motors v. Bayly (Red House Motors d/b/a Bayly’s Garage), 2026 Del. LEXIS 92 (Mar. 2, 2026), the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a Superior Court decision that the high court...

Delaware Supreme Court Reinstates IAB’s Denial of Sole Proprietor Coverage Delaware Supreme Court Reinstates IAB’s Denial of Sole Proprietor Coverage
Mar 3, 2026

Florida Court Invalidates Rules Expanding “Absolute Choice” Pharmacy Provision

In Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 1469 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 25, 2026), the First District Court of Appeal recently held that...

Florida Court Invalidates Rules Expanding “Absolute Choice” Pharmacy Provision Florida Court Invalidates Rules Expanding “Absolute Choice” Pharmacy Provision
Feb 26, 2026

Florida Court: IME Report Is Not a “Prescription” for Attendant Care

The Florida First District Court of Appeal has reversed an award of 24-hour attendant care benefits where the only “prescription” supporting the award appeared in an Independent Medical Examiner’s report...

Florida Court: IME Report Is Not a “Prescription” for Attendant Care Florida Court: IME Report Is Not a “Prescription” for Attendant Care
Feb 24, 2026

Issue Commentary: Where PA Worker’s Injury is Compensable, Does That Automatically Mean Co-Employee is Immune from Tort Liability?

PA Supreme Court Addresses Scope of Co-Employee Immunity In Brown v. Gaydos, 2026 Pa. LEXIS 267 (Pa. Feb. 18, 2026), a divided Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court’s reversal...

Issue Commentary: Where PA Worker’s Injury is Compensable, Does That Automatically Mean Co-Employee is Immune from Tort Liability? Issue Commentary: Where PA Worker’s Injury is Compensable, Does That Automatically Mean Co-Employee is Immune from Tort Liability?

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Oct 13, 2025

NY Court Affirms: Surveillance Showing Activity on “Good Days” Insufficient to Prove Fraud

In Matter of Harmon v. Faxton Sunset St. Luke’s Health Care Ctr. Inc., 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5692 (3d Dept. Oct. 9, 2025), New York’s Appellate Division (Third Department)...

NY Court Affirms: Surveillance Showing Activity on “Good Days” Insufficient to Prove Fraud NY Court Affirms: Surveillance Showing Activity on “Good Days” Insufficient to Prove Fraud
Oct 9, 2025

Cannabis-Derived Medications for Chronic Back Pain: Implications for Workers’ Compensation

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that cannabis-derived medications may be safer and more effective than opioids for treating chronic lower back pain—a finding with significant implications for workers’ compensation systems...

Cannabis-Derived Medications for Chronic Back Pain: Implications for Workers’ Compensation Cannabis-Derived Medications for Chronic Back Pain: Implications for Workers’ Compensation
Oct 8, 2025

NC Court Rejects Assumption of Risk Defense in Pepper-Spray Training Case

251008 NC Court Rejects Assumption of Risk Defense in Pepper-Spray Training Case The North Carolina Court of Appeals has rejected an employer’s argument that a nurse’s voluntary participation in pepper-spray...

NC Court Rejects Assumption of Risk Defense in Pepper-Spray Training Case NC Court Rejects Assumption of Risk Defense in Pepper-Spray Training Case
Oct 7, 2025

MS Court: Staffing Agency Worker Was School District’s “Borrowed Employee”

The Mississippi Court of Appeals recently affirmed summary judgment favoring a school district, holding that a cafeteria worker placed at an elementary school by a staffing agency was the district’s...

MS Court: Staffing Agency Worker Was School District’s “Borrowed Employee” MS Court: Staffing Agency Worker Was School District’s “Borrowed Employee”
Oct 3, 2025

IL: $5.8 Million Judgment Affirmed in Busboy’s Fatal Anaphylactic Shock Case

An Illinois appellate court has affirmed a nearly $5.8 million judgment in a negligence action filed by the widow of a restaurant employee who died from anaphylactic shock after eating...

IL: $5.8 Million Judgment Affirmed in Busboy’s Fatal Anaphylactic Shock Case IL: $5.8 Million Judgment Affirmed in Busboy’s Fatal Anaphylactic Shock Case
Sep 30, 2025

OR High Court: Worker Entitled to Medical Examination When Insurer Uses IME to Defend Denial

In Teitelman v. SAIF Corp. (In re Compensation of Cardoza), 2025 Ore. LEXIS 626 (Sept. 25, 2025), the Oregon Supreme Court held that injured workers are entitled to request their...

OR High Court: Worker Entitled to Medical Examination When Insurer Uses IME to Defend Denial OR High Court: Worker Entitled to Medical Examination When Insurer Uses IME to Defend Denial
Sep 29, 2025

First Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Puerto Rico Retaliation Case

In Mercado v. Hyannis Air Service, Inc., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24455 (1st Cir. Sept. 22, 2025), the First Circuit vacated a district court’s grant of summary judgment in a...

First Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Puerto Rico Retaliation Case First Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Puerto Rico Retaliation Case
Sep 26, 2025

NY Court Reverses Employment Classification Decision in Construction Injury Case

A New York appellate court has reversed a Workers’ Compensation Board decision that classified an injured construction worker as an employee, holding that the Board failed to apply the statutory...

NY Court Reverses Employment Classification Decision in Construction Injury Case NY Court Reverses Employment Classification Decision in Construction Injury Case
Sep 25, 2025

Ohio Supreme Court Affirms VSSR Award for Roofer’s Fall Through Skylight

The Ohio Supreme Court has upheld additional workers’ compensation benefits for a roofer injured in a fall, holding that merely transporting safety equipment to a jobsite does not satisfy fall-protection...

Ohio Supreme Court Affirms VSSR Award for Roofer’s Fall Through Skylight Ohio Supreme Court Affirms VSSR Award for Roofer’s Fall Through Skylight
Sep 23, 2025

Kentucky High Court Upholds Use of Disability Guidelines to Deny Long-Term Opioid Coverage

The Kentucky Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s Official Disability Guidelines (ODG) can be applied retroactively to deny workers’ compensation coverage for treatments that were previously deemed compensable for...

Kentucky High Court Upholds Use of Disability Guidelines to Deny Long-Term Opioid Coverage Kentucky High Court Upholds Use of Disability Guidelines to Deny Long-Term Opioid Coverage
Sep 19, 2025

GA Court Preserves Tort Rights Despite Workers’ Comp Settlement

The Georgia Court of Appeals has ruled that workers’ compensation settlements cannot generally bar separate tort claims when the parties expressly preserve those rights in writing. In Pierre v. MICRO-JA/X,...

GA Court Preserves Tort Rights Despite Workers’ Comp Settlement GA Court Preserves Tort Rights Despite Workers’ Comp Settlement
Sep 17, 2025

The Derivative Nature of Wrongful Death Claims Proves Decisive

The Mississippi Supreme Court, stressing the derivative nature of wrongful death actions, held that because a school resource officer for a county school district would have been barred—on exclusive remedy...

The Derivative Nature of Wrongful Death Claims Proves Decisive The Derivative Nature of Wrongful Death Claims Proves Decisive

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89