Newest Articles

Jul 14, 2026

Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field

Idaho Federal Court Finds Surveillance and a Full-Duty Release Defeat Workers' Comp Retaliatory Discharge Claim The U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho recently granted summary judgment for a...

Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field
Jul 13, 2026

FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims

Risk-Exposure Evidence Alone Can Establish the Causal Link, Justices Hold Last Thursday, In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Muñiz, the Supreme Court of Florida held that a workplace assault...

FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims
Jul 8, 2026

KY Court Revives Tort Claims From Mayfield Candle Factory Tornado Deaths

Supervisors Who Allegedly Blocked Exits Fell Outside the Workers’ Comp Act’s Exclusive Remedy The Kentucky Court of Appeals has revived tort claims brought by survivors of the December 2021 tornado...

KY Court Revives Tort Claims From Mayfield Candle Factory Tornado Deaths KY Court Revives Tort Claims From Mayfield Candle Factory Tornado Deaths
Jul 7, 2026

Progressive-Injury Diagnosis, Not Initial Symptoms, Starts the Limitations Clock

MS Court Rejects Time-Bar Finding in Casino Dealer’s Shoulder Injury Case The Mississippi Court of Appeals has reversed a Workers’ Compensation Commission order dismissing a casino dealer’s shoulder injury claim...

Progressive-Injury Diagnosis, Not Initial Symptoms, Starts the Limitations Clock Progressive-Injury Diagnosis, Not Initial Symptoms, Starts the Limitations Clock

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
May 14, 2026

Colorado Federal Court Dismisses Flight Attendants’ Tort Claims Against Frontier Airlines

Toxic Fumes, Fraud Allegations, and Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity A federal district court in Colorado has held that workers’ compensation exclusivity barred tort claims brought by flight attendants who allegedly suffered...

Colorado Federal Court Dismisses Flight Attendants’ Tort Claims Against Frontier Airlines Colorado Federal Court Dismisses Flight Attendants’ Tort Claims Against Frontier Airlines
May 13, 2026

MN Supreme Court: Co-employee Immunity Doesn’t Shield Vehicle Owner from Vicarious Liability

The Minnesota Supreme Court has affirmed a court of appeals ruling that the co-employee immunity provision of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Act does not protect motor vehicle owners from vicarious...

MN Supreme Court: Co-employee Immunity Doesn’t Shield Vehicle Owner from Vicarious Liability MN Supreme Court: Co-employee Immunity Doesn’t Shield Vehicle Owner from Vicarious Liability
May 11, 2026

Florida Rewrites Tolling Rules

Estes and Leighton Decisions Reshape Statute-of-Limitations Analysis in Compensation Cases In a pair of recent decisions, the Florida First District Court of Appeal has overruled more than twenty-five years of...

Florida Rewrites Tolling Rules Florida Rewrites Tolling Rules
May 7, 2026

California Workers’ Comp Costs Continued Upward Trend in 2025, WCRI Study Finds

California workers' compensation costs per claim rose 6 percent in 2025, continuing a pattern of sustained growth that began in 2022, with all three major cost components contributing to the...

California Workers’ Comp Costs Continued Upward Trend in 2025, WCRI Study Finds California Workers’ Comp Costs Continued Upward Trend in 2025, WCRI Study Finds
May 6, 2026

NY Court Affirms Dependent Adult Child Finding in COVID-19 Death Claim

The Appellate Division, Third Department, has affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Board finding that a deceased worker’s adult autistic son was dependent upon him at the time of his COVID-19 death,...

NY Court Affirms Dependent Adult Child Finding in COVID-19 Death Claim NY Court Affirms Dependent Adult Child Finding in COVID-19 Death Claim
May 5, 2026

Federal Court Holds PA’s Exclusivity Bars Tortious Interference Claim

Workers’ compensation exclusivity is often discussed in broad terms, but difficult questions sometimes arise at the margins—particularly when an employee alleges misconduct not in causing the original injury, but in...

Federal Court Holds PA’s Exclusivity Bars Tortious Interference Claim Federal Court Holds PA’s Exclusivity Bars Tortious Interference Claim
May 1, 2026

Substance Over Form: TN Court Looks Past Contract Label in Borrowed Employee Dispute

Lawyers are paid to draft agreements carefully. Contracts define relationships, allocate risk, and—at least in theory—clarify who stands in what legal posture to whom. But in workers’ compensation law, labels...

Substance Over Form: TN Court Looks Past Contract Label in Borrowed Employee Dispute Substance Over Form: TN Court Looks Past Contract Label in Borrowed Employee Dispute
Apr 30, 2026

Texas Court Rejects COVID-19 Death Claim

No Reliable Proof of Increased Occupational Risk As the first wave of COVID-19 workers’ compensation litigation begins to settle into the books, appellate courts are leaving behind decisions that will...

Texas Court Rejects COVID-19 Death Claim Texas Court Rejects COVID-19 Death Claim
Apr 28, 2026

FL Court Rejects Workers’ Comp Immunity Defense Where No Subcontract Ever Existed

Workers’ compensation immunity is often described as the product of a grand bargain: employers assume no-fault liability for workplace injuries, and in return receive protection from civil tort suits. But...

FL Court Rejects Workers’ Comp Immunity Defense Where No Subcontract Ever Existed FL Court Rejects Workers’ Comp Immunity Defense Where No Subcontract Ever Existed
Apr 27, 2026

Delaware High Court Clarifies What Counts as “Claiming” Workers’ Compensation

Reporting an Injury Alone Does Not Trigger Retaliation Protection In Delaware, an employee does not “claim” or “attempt to claim” workers’ compensation benefits merely by informing an employer of an...

Delaware High Court Clarifies What Counts as “Claiming” Workers’ Compensation Delaware High Court Clarifies What Counts as “Claiming” Workers’ Compensation
Apr 24, 2026

Federal Reclassification of Marijuana: A Development to Watch in Workers’ Comp

DOJ Moves Marijuana to Schedule III, but Practical Effects Remain Uncertain In a development that may have implications for workers’ compensation claims involving medical marijuana, the U.S. Department of Justice...

Federal Reclassification of Marijuana: A Development to Watch in Workers’ Comp Federal Reclassification of Marijuana: A Development to Watch in Workers’ Comp
Apr 23, 2026

NY Court Affirms Claim Where Workplace Injury Unwitnessed but Supported by Circumstantial Evidence

Third Department Emphasizes Board’s Fact-Finding Authority and Strength of § 21 Presumption A workplace injury need not be witnessed to be compensable where circumstantial evidence supports the occurrence of an...

NY Court Affirms Claim Where Workplace Injury Unwitnessed but Supported by Circumstantial Evidence NY Court Affirms Claim Where Workplace Injury Unwitnessed but Supported by Circumstantial Evidence

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89