Newest Articles

Aug 20, 2026

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day

Driscoll Agrees with the Larson Standard, Then Affirms Without Needing It The Iowa Court of Appeals has affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits to a city employee who developed...

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day
Aug 20, 2026

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day

Driscoll Agrees with the Larson Standard, Then Affirms Without Needing It The Iowa Court of Appeals has affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits to a city employee who developed...

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day
Aug 19, 2026

VA: One Basket, Two Injuries—and Only One Compensable Accident

In *Sairafianpour v. Loudoun County Public Schools*, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 430 (Aug. 11, 2026), the Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Commission decision awarding medical benefits...

VA: One Basket, Two Injuries—and Only One Compensable Accident VA: One Basket, Two Injuries—and Only One Compensable Accident
Aug 17, 2026

UT Supreme Court Affirms PTD Award—and Rejects Employer’s Claim to Employee’s Debt-Collection Settlement

In Granite School District v. Young, 2026 UT 29, 2026 Utah LEXIS 113 (Aug. 13, 2026), the Utah Supreme Court affirmed an award of permanent total disability benefits to a...

UT Supreme Court Affirms PTD Award—and Rejects Employer’s Claim to Employee’s Debt-Collection Settlement UT Supreme Court Affirms PTD Award—and Rejects Employer’s Claim to Employee’s Debt-Collection Settlement

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Jul 24, 2026

TX Court Affirms Exclusive Remedy Bar Despite Crew Leader’s Alleged Assault

Supervisor’s Authority Over PPE Didn't Make Him a “Vice Principal” The Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, affirmed summary judgment for an employer on all of an injured worker’s...

TX Court Affirms Exclusive Remedy Bar Despite Crew Leader’s Alleged Assault TX Court Affirms Exclusive Remedy Bar Despite Crew Leader’s Alleged Assault
Jul 21, 2026

Utah High Court: Suspension, Not Dismissal, Is the Only Sanction for Obstructing an IME

Statute’s Specific Remedy Overrides Rule 37 Discovery Sanctions, Even After Three Failed Medical Exams The Supreme Court of Utah has held that dismissal is not an available sanction for a...

Utah High Court: Suspension, Not Dismissal, Is the Only Sanction for Obstructing an IME Utah High Court: Suspension, Not Dismissal, Is the Only Sanction for Obstructing an IME
Jul 16, 2026

Personal Comfort Doctrine Reaches a Formal, Unpaid Break

PA Court Finds a 15-Minute Break’s Brevity Outweighs Its Formality The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently affirmed an award of workers’ compensation benefits to a pharmacy technician struck by a...

Personal Comfort Doctrine Reaches a Formal, Unpaid Break Personal Comfort Doctrine Reaches a Formal, Unpaid Break
Jul 14, 2026

Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field

Idaho Federal Court Finds Surveillance and a Full-Duty Release Defeat Workers' Comp Retaliatory Discharge Claim The U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho recently granted summary judgment for a...

Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field
Jul 13, 2026

FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims

Risk-Exposure Evidence Alone Can Establish the Causal Link, Justices Hold Last Thursday, In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Muñiz, the Supreme Court of Florida held that a workplace assault...

FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims
Jul 8, 2026

KY Court Revives Tort Claims From Mayfield Candle Factory Tornado Deaths

Supervisors Who Allegedly Blocked Exits Fell Outside the Workers’ Comp Act’s Exclusive Remedy The Kentucky Court of Appeals has revived tort claims brought by survivors of the December 2021 tornado...

KY Court Revives Tort Claims From Mayfield Candle Factory Tornado Deaths KY Court Revives Tort Claims From Mayfield Candle Factory Tornado Deaths
Jul 7, 2026

Progressive-Injury Diagnosis, Not Initial Symptoms, Starts the Limitations Clock

MS Court Rejects Time-Bar Finding in Casino Dealer’s Shoulder Injury Case The Mississippi Court of Appeals has reversed a Workers’ Compensation Commission order dismissing a casino dealer’s shoulder injury claim...

Progressive-Injury Diagnosis, Not Initial Symptoms, Starts the Limitations Clock Progressive-Injury Diagnosis, Not Initial Symptoms, Starts the Limitations Clock
Jul 6, 2026

The “Substantially Certain” Standard Survives Another Truck Wreck

Texas Court Finds Repeated Warnings About Vehicle Problems Insufficient to Avoid Exclusive Remedy Bar A Texas appellate court recently affirmed summary judgment for an employer on an intentional-tort claim, holding...

The “Substantially Certain” Standard Survives Another Truck Wreck The “Substantially Certain” Standard Survives Another Truck Wreck
Jul 1, 2026

LA Supreme Court: Fraud Forfeiture Runs Forward From Misrepresentation, Not Back to the Accident

High Court Overrules Fifth Circuit, Rejects Retroactive Application of Section 1208 On Monday, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that an employee who commits fraud under La. R.S. 23:1208 forfeits workers’...

LA Supreme Court: Fraud Forfeiture Runs Forward From Misrepresentation, Not Back to the Accident LA Supreme Court: Fraud Forfeiture Runs Forward From Misrepresentation, Not Back to the Accident
Jun 30, 2026

TX Court Rejects Death Benefits Claim Under “Coming and Going” Analysis

Company Vehicle and Overtime Work Insufficient to Establish Course and Scope The Court of Appeals of Texas, Eleventh District, affirmed summary judgment against a deceased employee’s beneficiaries, holding that an...

TX Court Rejects Death Benefits Claim Under “Coming and Going” Analysis TX Court Rejects Death Benefits Claim Under “Coming and Going” Analysis
Jun 29, 2026

North Dakota Subrogation: Having Cake and Eating it Too

ND Supreme Court Holds Judicial Estoppel is No Bar to WSI's Subrogation Interest The Supreme Court of North Dakota has affirmed a subrogation order requiring a workers’ compensation claimant to...

North Dakota Subrogation: Having Cake and Eating it Too North Dakota Subrogation: Having Cake and Eating it Too
Jun 25, 2026

Ohio’s Death Benefits Statute Limits Dependent Adult Child to $3,000 After Father’s Work-Related Killing

Supreme Court Holds “Prospective Dependent” Award Forecloses Weekly-Benefit Analysis Under R.C. 4123.59(D) Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Ohio vacated a lower court’s writ of mandamus and held that once the...

Ohio’s Death Benefits Statute Limits Dependent Adult Child to $3,000 After Father’s Work-Related Killing Ohio’s Death Benefits Statute Limits Dependent Adult Child to $3,000 After Father’s Work-Related Killing

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89