Reiterating that aTexas workers’ compensation carrier is entitled to the “first money” an injured worker recovered in a third-party tort action—here, settlement of a medical malpractice claim—and stressing further that...
Texas Court Stresses Comp Carrier is Entitled to Full “First Money” in Worker’s Third-Party Tort Settlement Texas Court Stresses Comp Carrier is Entitled to Full “First Money” in Worker’s Third-Party Tort SettlementDodging an issue that had spawned multiple amicus curiae briefs regarding an interesting (and important) question—whether an employee’s representation in a workers’ compensation settlement agreement that he had only suffered...
IL Supreme Court Sidesteps Important Issue on Technical Grounds IL Supreme Court Sidesteps Important Issue on Technical GroundsA Florida appellate court affirmed a finding by a state Judge of Compensation Claims that a subcontractor’s workers’ compensation policy had been cancelled prior to a work-related injury suffered by...
FL Insurer’s Cancellation Effective in Spite of Issuance of Certificate of Insurance FL Insurer’s Cancellation Effective in Spite of Issuance of Certificate of InsuranceThe Court of Appeals of North Carolina affirmed a decision by the state’s Industrial Commission that denied additional medical benefits claimed by an injured worker on statute of limitations grounds...
Medical Provider's Decision to Bill Medicare, Rather than Carrier, Results in NC Employee's Loss of Benefits on Statute of Limitations Grounds Medical Provider's Decision to Bill Medicare, Rather than Carrier, Results in NC Employee's Loss of Benefits on Statute of Limitations GroundsIn a real “head-scratcher,” an Arkansas appellate court, relying on a 50-year-old decision of the state’s Supreme Court, held that the Arkansas Commission did not err when it determined that...
Arkansas Carrier Wins: Requires Premiums Be Paid on Worker’s Earnings, Then Says He Was Independent Contractor Arkansas Carrier Wins: Requires Premiums Be Paid on Worker’s Earnings, Then Says He Was Independent ContractorIn a complex case, with procedural twists and turns, the Supreme Court of Wyoming reversed a finding that an employee’s claim for workers’ compensation benefits was barred because he failed...
Wyoming High Court Says Both Employer and Division of Workers’ Compensation Estopped From Using Statute of Limitations Defense Wyoming High Court Says Both Employer and Division of Workers’ Compensation Estopped From Using Statute of Limitations DefenseThe Supreme Court of New Mexico recently held that a death benefits claim filed by the widow of an off-duty police officer, who drowned while rescuing a twelve-year-old boy from...
New Mexico: Late Filing of Death Benefits Claim May Be Excused Where Delay Was Due, In Part, to Actions of Employer New Mexico: Late Filing of Death Benefits Claim May Be Excused Where Delay Was Due, In Part, to Actions of EmployerBecause settlement agreements ordinarily cover only those claims or rights that are specifically mentioned within the four corners of the agreement itself [see Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 132.05], attention...
Indiana: After Approval of Settlement Agreement By Board, Estate of Deceased Worker May Not Proceed Against “Employer” in Tort On Basis of Claimed Status as Independent Contractor Indiana: After Approval of Settlement Agreement By Board, Estate of Deceased Worker May Not Proceed Against “Employer” in Tort On Basis of Claimed Status as Independent Contractor