In a case with a rather bizarre fact pattern, an Oregon appellate court affirmed a decision by the state’s Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded benefits to a painter who sustained...
Oregon Employee Recovers Benefits Following Explosion of Energy Drink Oregon Employee Recovers Benefits Following Explosion of Energy DrinkReiterating New York’s special “gray area” rule, pursuant to which injuries sustained in public areas near the employment—but not on the employer’s premises—are nevertheless compensable where the risks of street...
NY Court Agrees Claimant’s Injuries Occurred Within “Gray Area” of Employment NY Court Agrees Claimant’s Injuries Occurred Within “Gray Area” of EmploymentA New York appellate court affirmed a decision by the state’s Workers’ Compensation Board that denied a claim for consequential Lyme disease in spite of an opinion offered by an...
NY Worker Fails to Establish Claim for Lyme Disease NY Worker Fails to Establish Claim for Lyme DiseaseApplying Arkansas’ relatively narrow employment-related rule, which excludes compensation for an injury which was inflicted upon the employee at a time when employment services were not being performed [see Ark....
Arkansas Horse-Racing Employee’s Leap From Burning Stable Was Not Compensable Arkansas Horse-Racing Employee’s Leap From Burning Stable Was Not CompensableThe Court of Appeals of South Carolina affirmed a decision by the Appellate Panel of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Commission that awarded death benefits to the children of a motel...
Fatal Shooting of SC Motel Worker Found Compensable Under “Bunkhouse Rule” Fatal Shooting of SC Motel Worker Found Compensable Under “Bunkhouse Rule”An Arkansas appellate court affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits to an employee who suffered mysterious GI bleeding while completing workers’ compensation claims forms at his employer’s facility, and...
Arkansas Court Stresses Difference Between “Idiopathic” and “Unexplained” Arkansas Court Stresses Difference Between “Idiopathic” and “Unexplained”Where a chef/cook, employed by a non-profit organization, sustained injuries at her employer’s “Family Fun Day”, an event that included recreational activities, games and music, held on a Saturday for...
NJ High Court Allows Claim for Injury Sustained During Charity’s “Fun Day” NJ High Court Allows Claim for Injury Sustained During Charity’s “Fun Day”A New York appellate court reversed a finding by the state's Workers' Compensation Board that had denied workers' compensation benefits to a home health attendant who provided care to one...
24-Hour NY Home Health Attendant’s Stop at Personal Physician’s Office Was Not a Deviation from Employment 24-Hour NY Home Health Attendant’s Stop at Personal Physician’s Office Was Not a Deviation from EmploymentApplying Virginia’s “actual risk” doctrine, which generally holds that simple acts of walking, bending, turning, or even climbing stairs–without proof of any other contributing environmental factors–are not risks of employment,...
Virginia Court Sticks to its “Actual Risk” Doctrine Virginia Court Sticks to its “Actual Risk” DoctrineSeveral weeks ago, an attorney friend called for some advice. One of his clients had asked if the client’s business might face additional liability if–once the COVID-19 vaccines are generally...
Opinion Mondays: Do Employers Face Additional Liability for COVID-19 Vaccination Side Effects? Opinion Mondays: Do Employers Face Additional Liability for COVID-19 Vaccination Side Effects?A defendant/co-worker’s act of bringing her dog to the employer’s residential facility for pregnant women to serve as a comfort animal was an activity that had to do with and...
Texas Employee’s Suit Against Co-Worker for Dog Bite is Barred by Exclusivity Texas Employee’s Suit Against Co-Worker for Dog Bite is Barred by ExclusivityThe Supreme Court of Illinois reversed a decision of the Appellate Court, Workers’ Compensation Division, that in turn had affirmed a denial of benefits to a restaurant sous-chef who sustained...
Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Rule Regarding Injuries Stemming From Common Bodily Movements Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Rule Regarding Injuries Stemming From Common Bodily Movements