The New York Workers’ Compensation Board was within its powers when it found an injured worker had violated N.Y. Workers’ Comp. Law § 114-a, by failing to disclose on an...
Failure of Injured NY Worker to Disclose Auto Accident to IME Physician Results in Loss of Benefits Failure of Injured NY Worker to Disclose Auto Accident to IME Physician Results in Loss of BenefitsDespite the fact that a workers’ compensation insurer was aware of an injured worker’s third-party action against the driver of a motor vehicle, and even received and accepted more than...
NY Worker Barred From Future Benefits Even After Paying Comp Insurer $63K From Settlement Proceeds NY Worker Barred From Future Benefits Even After Paying Comp Insurer $63K From Settlement ProceedsW. Va. Code 23-4-15(a), which requires workers’ compensation claims to be filed within six months from and after the date of injury or death, as the case may be, is...
West Virginia Court Stresses Six-Month Statute of Limitations is Strictly Construed West Virginia Court Stresses Six-Month Statute of Limitations is Strictly ConstruedWhere a Florida workers’ compensation claimant disagreed with the medical opinion of the employer/carrier’s authorized physician, sought a one-time change in physicians pursuant to § 440.13(2)(f), Fla. Stat., saw a...
Florida JCC Errs in Failing to Appoint EMA to Resolve Medical Dispute Florida JCC Errs in Failing to Appoint EMA to Resolve Medical DisputeA Wisconsin appellate court held that a deceased worker’s automobile insurance carrier, which had written a policy that included underinsured motorist’s (UIM) limits of $250,000, may only reduce its coverage...
Wisconsin Court Says UIM Carrier May Not Deduct Comp Benefits Subject to Subrogation Lien Wisconsin Court Says UIM Carrier May Not Deduct Comp Benefits Subject to Subrogation LienAn Ohio appellate court recently reversed a state Commission’s decision that had awarded TTD benefits to an employee who gave his employer a two-week notice that she intended to leave...
Ohio Claimant Disqualified from TTD Because She Gave Two-Week Notice Four Days Before Injury Ohio Claimant Disqualified from TTD Because She Gave Two-Week Notice Four Days Before InjuryIn an unpublished decision, an Illinois appellate court reversed a decision of a county circuit court confirming an award of workers’ compensation benefits by the state’s Workers’ Compensation Commission on...
Illinois Court Nixes Jurisdiction When Injury and Employment Contract Were in Indiana Illinois Court Nixes Jurisdiction When Injury and Employment Contract Were in IndianaThe Supreme Court of South Dakota recently affirmed a trial court’s decision that granted summary judgment to a municipality and a volunteer fire department on the basis that the department’s...
South Dakota Court “Borrows” Going and Coming Rule for Negligence Action South Dakota Court “Borrows” Going and Coming Rule for Negligence ActionStressing that a claimant’s “injury” and “impairment” are not necessarily equivalents, an Iowa appellate court affirmed a determination that an injured worker was entitled to permanent partial disability benefits; he...
Iowa Court Affirms PPD Award Where Effects of Knee Injury Extended Beyond the Leg Iowa Court Affirms PPD Award Where Effects of Knee Injury Extended Beyond the LegA Florida appellate court affirmed a decision by a judge of compensation claims that found a law enforcement officer was not entitled to the special presumption of compensability related to...
Catch 22 Prevents Florida Officer From Utilizing Presumption of Compensability Catch 22 Prevents Florida Officer From Utilizing Presumption of CompensabilityWhere an injured employee sought a one-time change of physician and, within the five-day period designated in § 440.13(2)(f), Fla. Stat., was first given a referral physician and appointment options...
Florida Court Construes One-Time Change of Physician Statute Florida Court Construes One-Time Change of Physician StatuteWhile it is often said that the procedural aspects of a workers’ compensation dispute are largely informal, with the parties not always being bound to the narrowest interpretations of notice...
NY Claimant’s Service Upon Third-Party Administrator Was Not Service Upon the Carrier Itself NY Claimant’s Service Upon Third-Party Administrator Was Not Service Upon the Carrier Itself