Newest Articles

Aug 20, 2026

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day

Driscoll Agrees with the Larson Standard, Then Affirms Without Needing It The Iowa Court of Appeals has affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits to a city employee who developed...

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day
Aug 20, 2026

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day

Driscoll Agrees with the Larson Standard, Then Affirms Without Needing It The Iowa Court of Appeals has affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits to a city employee who developed...

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day
Aug 19, 2026

VA: One Basket, Two Injuries—and Only One Compensable Accident

In *Sairafianpour v. Loudoun County Public Schools*, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 430 (Aug. 11, 2026), the Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Commission decision awarding medical benefits...

VA: One Basket, Two Injuries—and Only One Compensable Accident VA: One Basket, Two Injuries—and Only One Compensable Accident
Aug 17, 2026

UT Supreme Court Affirms PTD Award—and Rejects Employer’s Claim to Employee’s Debt-Collection Settlement

In Granite School District v. Young, 2026 UT 29, 2026 Utah LEXIS 113 (Aug. 13, 2026), the Utah Supreme Court affirmed an award of permanent total disability benefits to a...

UT Supreme Court Affirms PTD Award—and Rejects Employer’s Claim to Employee’s Debt-Collection Settlement UT Supreme Court Affirms PTD Award—and Rejects Employer’s Claim to Employee’s Debt-Collection Settlement

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Nov 19, 2025

Washington Court Rejects Attempt to Reduce Social Security Offset Based on Attorney Fees

In an unpublished decision, the Washington Court of Appeals has affirmed that the Department of Labor and Industries is not required to account for a claimant’s attorney fees when calculating...

Washington Court Rejects Attempt to Reduce Social Security Offset Based on Attorney Fees Washington Court Rejects Attempt to Reduce Social Security Offset Based on Attorney Fees
Nov 18, 2025

NV Supreme Court: Special Occupational Lung Disease Statute Does Not Cover COVID-19 Claims

The Nevada Supreme Court has affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits to a correctional officer who contracted COVID-19 from a coworker, holding that Nevada’s special occupational lung disease statute...

NV Supreme Court: Special Occupational Lung Disease Statute Does Not Cover COVID-19 Claims NV Supreme Court: Special Occupational Lung Disease Statute Does Not Cover COVID-19 Claims
Nov 17, 2025

NY Claimant’s Social Media Posts Undermine His Misrepresentation Defense

In Matter of Qureshi v. Rite Aid Corp., 2025 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6383 (3rd Dept. Nov. 13, 2025), a New York appellate court affirmed a decision by the state’s...

NY Claimant’s Social Media Posts Undermine His Misrepresentation Defense NY Claimant’s Social Media Posts Undermine His Misrepresentation Defense
Nov 14, 2025

Tort Plaintiff Relies on Comp Doctrine to Establish Employer Vicarious Liability

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, recently held that a tort plaintiff could rely on a workers’ compensation doctrine—the “special mission” exception to the going-and-coming rule—to establish an employer’s...

Tort Plaintiff Relies on Comp Doctrine to Establish Employer Vicarious Liability Tort Plaintiff Relies on Comp Doctrine to Establish Employer Vicarious Liability
Nov 13, 2025

FL Court: Misrepresentation Bar Limited to Specific Claim

In Pinellas County Transit Authority v. Jackson, 2025 Fla. App. LEXIS 8502 (1st DCA Nov. 12, 2025) a Florida appellate court held that the misrepresentation bar under § 440.105, Fla....

FL Court: Misrepresentation Bar Limited to Specific Claim FL Court: Misrepresentation Bar Limited to Specific Claim
Nov 11, 2025

Alabama Court Upholds 15 Percent Attorney Fee Cap in Comp Cases

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals has rejected a constitutional challenge to Alabama’s statutory cap on claimant attorney fees, reaffirming the long-standing 15 per cent limitation in Ala. Code §...

Alabama Court Upholds 15 Percent Attorney Fee Cap in Comp Cases Alabama Court Upholds 15 Percent Attorney Fee Cap in Comp Cases
Nov 10, 2025

Delaware High Court Reaffirms Limits on Subrogation in UIM Awards

In ProAssurance Grp. v. Manz, 2025 Del. LEXIS 416 (Del. Nov. 7, 2025), the Delaware Supreme Court recently reaffirmed that workers’ compensation carriers’ subrogation rights against third-party recoveries extend only...

Delaware High Court Reaffirms Limits on Subrogation in UIM Awards Delaware High Court Reaffirms Limits on Subrogation in UIM Awards
Nov 7, 2025

Virginia Court Finds Dog Bite Compensable Under “Actual Risk” Doctrine

Utilizing what it calls the “actual risk” doctrine, the Virginia Court of Appeals recently affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Commission ruling that a camp employee’s dog bite injury arose out of...

Virginia Court Finds Dog Bite Compensable Under “Actual Risk” Doctrine Virginia Court Finds Dog Bite Compensable Under “Actual Risk” Doctrine
Nov 5, 2025

NY: Brief School Hallway Contact Insufficient to Prove COVID-19 Work Exposure

A school custodian’s limited contact with students passing through hallways while mopping did not constitute the sort of “elevated risk of exposure” necessary to establish a compensable COVID-19 claim, send...

NY: Brief School Hallway Contact Insufficient to Prove COVID-19 Work Exposure NY: Brief School Hallway Contact Insufficient to Prove COVID-19 Work Exposure
Nov 3, 2025

Iowa Court: Skin Grafts for Two Body Parts are Scheduled—Not Unscheduled Injury

A workplace injury requiring skin grafting from one body part to repair another doesn’t automatically become an unscheduled whole-body claim, the Iowa Court of Appeals held in Laguerre v. JBS...

Iowa Court: Skin Grafts for Two Body Parts are Scheduled—Not Unscheduled Injury Iowa Court: Skin Grafts for Two Body Parts are Scheduled—Not Unscheduled Injury
Oct 30, 2025

KY Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Benefits in COVID-19 Case

Skirts With Allowing Fault-Based Rule to Deny Claim In Estate of Perkins v. North American Stainless, 2025 Ky. LEXIS 221 (Oct. 23, 2025), the Kentucky Supreme Court affirmed the denial...

KY Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Benefits in COVID-19 Case KY Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Benefits in COVID-19 Case
Oct 28, 2025

MN Supreme Court: Teacher’s Injury During Student Basketball Practice Compensable

The Minnesota Supreme Court, adopting language from Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 20.01 (“Larson”), affirmed that a middle school teacher’s knee injury sustained while playing basketball with students during an...

MN Supreme Court: Teacher’s Injury During Student Basketball Practice Compensable MN Supreme Court: Teacher’s Injury During Student Basketball Practice Compensable

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89