Newest Articles

Mar 10, 2026

Second Circuit Bars Medical Marijuana Reimbursement Under the Longshore Act

In Garcia v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6549 (2d Cir. Mar. 5, 2026), the Second Circuit denied a petition for review filed by a...

Second Circuit Bars Medical Marijuana Reimbursement Under the Longshore Act Second Circuit Bars Medical Marijuana Reimbursement Under the Longshore Act
Mar 6, 2026

New York’s Hidden Cost Problem: WCRI Examines the Price of Delivering Benefits

Every dollar spent on workers’ compensation falls into one of two broad categories: benefits paid to injured workers—medical care and wage replacement—and the costs of delivering those benefits. The second...

New York’s Hidden Cost Problem: WCRI Examines the Price of Delivering Benefits New York’s Hidden Cost Problem: WCRI Examines the Price of Delivering Benefits
Mar 5, 2026

Delaware Supreme Court Reinstates IAB’s Denial of Sole Proprietor Coverage

In Motors v. Bayly (Red House Motors d/b/a Bayly’s Garage), 2026 Del. LEXIS 92 (Mar. 2, 2026), the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a Superior Court decision that the high court...

Delaware Supreme Court Reinstates IAB’s Denial of Sole Proprietor Coverage Delaware Supreme Court Reinstates IAB’s Denial of Sole Proprietor Coverage
Mar 3, 2026

Florida Court Invalidates Rules Expanding “Absolute Choice” Pharmacy Provision

In Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 1469 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 25, 2026), the First District Court of Appeal recently held that...

Florida Court Invalidates Rules Expanding “Absolute Choice” Pharmacy Provision Florida Court Invalidates Rules Expanding “Absolute Choice” Pharmacy Provision

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Dec 20, 2019

Divided Rhode Island Supreme Court Nixes Conclusive Cancer Presumptions for Firefighters

R.I. Gen. Laws § 45-19.1-1 (1956) does not create a conclusive presumption that cancer in firefighters arises out of and in the course of the employment, held a divided Supreme...

Divided Rhode Island Supreme Court Nixes Conclusive Cancer Presumptions for Firefighters Divided Rhode Island Supreme Court Nixes Conclusive Cancer Presumptions for Firefighters
Dec 19, 2019

Nevada Supreme Court Sets Out Rules Regarding Traveling Employees

In a case of first impression, the Supreme Court of Nevada addressed the traveling employee rule and, quoting Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 25.01, approved of the so-called Larson rule...

Nevada Supreme Court Sets Out Rules Regarding Traveling Employees Nevada Supreme Court Sets Out Rules Regarding Traveling Employees
Dec 17, 2019

Federal Court Says Action under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act is Not Barred by Exclusivity

In an interesting case that illustrates the tension between some of the recent technological “advances” that purportedly streamline traditional workplace practices, a federal district court yesterday held that a plaintiff’s...

Federal Court Says Action under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act is Not Barred by Exclusivity Federal Court Says Action under Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act is Not Barred by Exclusivity
Dec 16, 2019

Proximity of NY Worker’s Termination to Claim Could Not Alone Establish Retaliatory Motive

Where a New York workers’ compensation claimant admitted that, prior to his work-related injury, he had been told by an employer’s representative that the employer had contacted the claimant’s union...

Proximity of NY Worker’s Termination to Claim Could Not Alone Establish Retaliatory Motive Proximity of NY Worker’s Termination to Claim Could Not Alone Establish Retaliatory Motive
Dec 13, 2019

State Court Strikes Down New York Board’s Eight-Page Brief Limitation

A regulation of New York’s Workers’ Compensation Board [N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs., tit. 12, § 300.13(b)(1)(i)] that authorizes the Board to dismiss an application for Board review where...

State Court Strikes Down New York Board’s Eight-Page Brief Limitation State Court Strikes Down New York Board’s Eight-Page Brief Limitation
Dec 12, 2019

Divided Florida Court Says On-the-Clock Bowling Outing Was Not a Recreational Event

In a split decision, a Florida appellate court held that an employee’s injuries sustained while bowling with co-workers during an employer-sponsored event arose out of and in the course of...

Divided Florida Court Says On-the-Clock Bowling Outing Was Not a Recreational Event Divided Florida Court Says On-the-Clock Bowling Outing Was Not a Recreational Event
Dec 11, 2019

Nebraska Employer Need Not Pay for Unauthorized Medical Treatment in Florida Following Worker’s Relocation

Employer Balks at Out-of-State MD’s Recommendation of Long-Term Opioid Cocktail That an injured worker’s “Form 50” physician had died and the worker had subsequently moved from Nebraska to Florida did...

Nebraska Employer Need Not Pay for Unauthorized Medical Treatment in Florida Following Worker’s Relocation Nebraska Employer Need Not Pay for Unauthorized Medical Treatment in Florida Following Worker’s Relocation
Dec 10, 2019

Top 10 Workers’ Compensation Cases of 2019

At about this time each year, I highlight what I think are the ten most important workers’ compensation decisions reported during the calendar year. In some respects, 2019 has been...

Top 10 Workers’ Compensation Cases of 2019 Top 10 Workers’ Compensation Cases of 2019
Dec 9, 2019

Alabama Employer’s Actions After Injury Might Result in Tort Liability

Where an injured worker asserted claims based on additional injuries that he alleged arose from conduct that occurred following his workplace injury (he alleged, inter alia, that after he suffered a...

Alabama Employer’s Actions After Injury Might Result in Tort Liability Alabama Employer’s Actions After Injury Might Result in Tort Liability
Dec 6, 2019

Absent Finding of Partial Disability, NY Claimant Need Not Show Attachment to Labor Market

A New York appellate court held yesterday that where an employer raised the issue of labor market attachment at a hearing on the claim and the WCLJ did not make...

Absent Finding of Partial Disability, NY Claimant Need Not Show Attachment to Labor Market Absent Finding of Partial Disability, NY Claimant Need Not Show Attachment to Labor Market
Dec 5, 2019

FL Court Laments “Herculean Task” for Claimants in Toxic Exposure Claims

Acknowledging what it called “the Herculean task created by the heightened burden of proof for toxic exposure claims,” yet noting as well that it was for the Florida Legislature, not...

FL Court Laments “Herculean Task” for Claimants in Toxic Exposure Claims FL Court Laments “Herculean Task” for Claimants in Toxic Exposure Claims
Dec 4, 2019

MN High Court Stands Firm: Employer and Third-Party are NOT “Severally Liable” for Employee's Injuries

The 2003 amendment to Minn. Stat. § 604.02, subd. 1, did not overturn a line of Minnesota decisions that had concluded that an employer and a third-party tortfeasor were not...

MN High Court Stands Firm: Employer and Third-Party are NOT “Severally Liable” for Employee's Injuries MN High Court Stands Firm: Employer and Third-Party are NOT “Severally Liable” for Employee's Injuries

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89