Newest Articles

Oct 7, 2026

Two Boxes Checked “No”

LA Second Circuit Affirms Forfeiture for False Answers on Pre-Hire Questionnaires About Prior Work Accidents and a Recommended Surgery Louisiana’s Second Circuit Court of Appeal has affirmed a ruling that...

Two Boxes Checked “No” Two Boxes Checked “No”
Oct 5, 2026

Louisiana Court: Paid a Percentage, Still an Employee

LA Fourth Circuit, 3–2, Holds Dump-Truck Driver Paid 25% of Truck Earnings Was an Employee Despite 1099; Dissent Invokes Manifest-Error Review The Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit recently reversed...

Louisiana Court: Paid a Percentage, Still an Employee Louisiana Court: Paid a Percentage, Still an Employee
Sep 29, 2026

Alcohol Falls Outside KY’s Presumption of Causation

KY Supreme Court Holds the Statutory Presumption Against Recovery for Intoxicating Substances Does Not Apply to Alcohol The Kentucky Supreme Court has affirmed benefits for a traffic flagger who was...

Alcohol Falls Outside KY’s Presumption of Causation Alcohol Falls Outside KY’s Presumption of Causation
Sep 28, 2026

The Heart Has Wiring, Too

FL First DCA Holds Harlem’s Narrow “Heart Disease” Definition Does Not Bar a Firefighter’s Arrhythmia Claim Under the Heart-Lung Presumption Florida’s First District Court of Appeal has affirmed an award...

The Heart Has Wiring, Too The Heart Has Wiring, Too

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Jun 19, 2020

MA Court OKs Division of Workers' Comp Settlement Between Divorcing Couple

In a Massachusetts divorce proceeding, a state appellate court affirmed a decision by a state Probate and Family Court judge that had allocated $50,000 of the husband’s remaining workers’ compensation...

MA Court OKs Division of Workers' Comp Settlement Between Divorcing Couple MA Court OKs Division of Workers' Comp Settlement Between Divorcing Couple
Jun 18, 2020

Virginia Employee's Bowel Disease Tied to Puncture Wound in Foot

In a decision not designated for publication, a Virginia appellate court affirmed an award of workers' compensation benefits to a claimant who contended he developed Crohn's colitis — a type...

Virginia Employee's Bowel Disease Tied to Puncture Wound in Foot Virginia Employee's Bowel Disease Tied to Puncture Wound in Foot
Jun 16, 2020

Utah Court Agrees that Leap from Truck Was Unusual

In another case involving Utah's so-called "Allen standard," under which an employee with a preexisting condition faces a heightened standard for proving legal causation, a state appellate court affirmed a...

Utah Court Agrees that Leap from Truck Was Unusual Utah Court Agrees that Leap from Truck Was Unusual
Jun 15, 2020

Texas High Court Shows "Substantially Certain" Rule Differs "Substantially" from State to State

In an opinion that provides perhaps the best discussion of the intentional injury exception to a state’s exclusive remedy rule, the Supreme Court of Texas held that in order for...

Texas High Court Shows "Substantially Certain" Rule Differs "Substantially" from State to State Texas High Court Shows "Substantially Certain" Rule Differs "Substantially" from State to State
Jun 11, 2020

Utah Worker Established Causation in Spite of Preexisting Knee Condition

Applying Utah’s so-called “Allen standard,” under which an employee with a preexisting condition must show that her employment contributed “something substantial” to increase the risk already faced in everyday life,...

Utah Worker Established Causation in Spite of Preexisting Knee Condition Utah Worker Established Causation in Spite of Preexisting Knee Condition
Jun 9, 2020

NY Truck Driver's Reckless Driving Does Not Defeat Her Claim

A New York appellate court affirmed a decision by the state's Workers' Compensation Board that awarded benefits to a New York-based truck driver who sustained injuries in a roll-over accident...

NY Truck Driver's Reckless Driving Does Not Defeat Her Claim NY Truck Driver's Reckless Driving Does Not Defeat Her Claim
Jun 8, 2020

Opinion Mondays: D.C. Stroke Case Shows Fighting COVID-19 Presumptions is Going to Be Up-Hill Battle

In a decision that illustrates the difficulty that many employers will face if their state has adopted a presumption of compensability in COVID-19 cases, the District of Columbia Court of...

Opinion Mondays: D.C. Stroke Case Shows Fighting COVID-19 Presumptions is Going to Be Up-Hill Battle Opinion Mondays: D.C. Stroke Case Shows Fighting COVID-19 Presumptions is Going to Be Up-Hill Battle
Jun 4, 2020

CT Worker Fails in Intentional Tort Action Against Employer

A Connecticut appellate court recently held that a state trial court did not err when it granted summary judgment in favor of an employer-defendant in an intentional tort claimed filed...

CT Worker Fails in Intentional Tort Action Against Employer CT Worker Fails in Intentional Tort Action Against Employer
Jun 3, 2020

Florida Court Asks State Supreme Court for Guidance on One-Time Change of Physician Rules

Analyzing one of the most contentious provisions within Florida's Workers' Compensation Act — § 440.13(2)(f), Fla. Stat. — which, under certain conditions, grants an injured worker a one-time change of...

Florida Court Asks State Supreme Court for Guidance on One-Time Change of Physician Rules Florida Court Asks State Supreme Court for Guidance on One-Time Change of Physician Rules
Jun 2, 2020

MD Court Says Retaliatory "Non-Renewal" of Contract Same as Retaliatory Firing

In a case of first impression, a Maryland appellate court held that a state trial court erred when it held that a retaliatory discharge claim may only be maintained when...

MD Court Says Retaliatory "Non-Renewal" of Contract Same as Retaliatory Firing MD Court Says Retaliatory "Non-Renewal" of Contract Same as Retaliatory Firing
Jun 1, 2020

Opinion Mondays: 30 Days into California's COVID-19 Executive Order, Questions Abound

As the nation moves, with fits and starts, toward some sort of recovery from the COVID-19 crisis, many within the workers’ compensation system are still trying to digest significant changes...

Opinion Mondays: 30 Days into California's COVID-19 Executive Order, Questions Abound Opinion Mondays: 30 Days into California's COVID-19 Executive Order, Questions Abound
May 28, 2020

Divided NY Appellate Court Finds Claimant's Need of Surgery Insufficient to Show Worsening Condition

In a divided decision, a New York appellate court recently affirmed a Board determination that a claimant, who had earlier been awarded PPD benefits and whose condition apparently worsened so...

Divided NY Appellate Court Finds Claimant's Need of Surgery Insufficient to Show Worsening Condition Divided NY Appellate Court Finds Claimant's Need of Surgery Insufficient to Show Worsening Condition

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89