Newest Articles

Jul 21, 2026

Utah High Court: Suspension, Not Dismissal, Is the Only Sanction for Obstructing an IME

Statute’s Specific Remedy Overrides Rule 37 Discovery Sanctions, Even After Three Failed Medical Exams The Supreme Court of Utah has held that dismissal is not an available sanction for a...

Utah High Court: Suspension, Not Dismissal, Is the Only Sanction for Obstructing an IME Utah High Court: Suspension, Not Dismissal, Is the Only Sanction for Obstructing an IME
Jul 16, 2026

Personal Comfort Doctrine Reaches a Formal, Unpaid Break

PA Court Finds a 15-Minute Break’s Brevity Outweighs Its Formality The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently affirmed an award of workers’ compensation benefits to a pharmacy technician struck by a...

Personal Comfort Doctrine Reaches a Formal, Unpaid Break Personal Comfort Doctrine Reaches a Formal, Unpaid Break
Jul 14, 2026

Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field

Idaho Federal Court Finds Surveillance and a Full-Duty Release Defeat Workers' Comp Retaliatory Discharge Claim The U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho recently granted summary judgment for a...

Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field Trucker’s Retaliation Claim Runs Aground in His Own Hay Field
Jul 13, 2026

FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims

Risk-Exposure Evidence Alone Can Establish the Causal Link, Justices Hold Last Thursday, In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Muñiz, the Supreme Court of Florida held that a workplace assault...

FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims FL High Court Rejects Motive Requirement for Workplace Assault Claims

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Jul 10, 2020

In NY Apportionment Claims, Key is Existence of Prior Disability, Not its Cause

A New York appellate court held that since an employer and carrier had prevailed in a 2013 scheduled loss of use (SLU) claim on causation grounds — the WCLJ’s decision...

In NY Apportionment Claims, Key is Existence of Prior Disability, Not its Cause In NY Apportionment Claims, Key is Existence of Prior Disability, Not its Cause
Jul 9, 2020

NY Retail Employee Loses Her "Gray Area" Injury Claim

Again illustrating the discretionary power of a board or commission to make factual findings, a New York appellate court affirmed a decision by the state’s Workers’ Compensation Board denying benefits...

NY Retail Employee Loses Her "Gray Area" Injury Claim NY Retail Employee Loses Her "Gray Area" Injury Claim
Jul 8, 2020

407-Page IME Report Insufficient to Rebut Hawai'i's Presumption of Compensability

Two months ago, I posited that a decision in an old influenza case from Hawaii might give us some indication as to how a COVID-19 presumption of compensability might operate...

407-Page IME Report Insufficient to Rebut Hawai'i's Presumption of Compensability 407-Page IME Report Insufficient to Rebut Hawai'i's Presumption of Compensability
Jul 7, 2020

NY Worker’s Failure to Disclose Religious Activity Does Not Bar Her Receipt of Benefits

An injured worker’s unpaid religious activity within a small church, which included providing occasional sermons, counseling a small group of parishioners, assisting with Bible studies and baptisms, and the like,...

NY Worker’s Failure to Disclose Religious Activity Does Not Bar Her Receipt of Benefits NY Worker’s Failure to Disclose Religious Activity Does Not Bar Her Receipt of Benefits
Jun 30, 2020

Texas High Court Collides with 10th Circuit’s Air Ambulance Decision

In a long, winding, yet carefully-worded decision (with both concurring and dissenting opinions), a divided Supreme Court of Texas held the federal Airline Deregulation Act (ADA) does not preempt Texas’s...

Texas High Court Collides with 10th Circuit’s Air Ambulance Decision Texas High Court Collides with 10th Circuit’s Air Ambulance Decision
Jun 26, 2020

New York Mother's Intentional Tort Action Against Farm Owner Barred

A New York appellate court affirmed a decision of a state trial court that had granted summary judgment to a defendant/farm owner who had been sued by the mother of...

New York Mother's Intentional Tort Action Against Farm Owner Barred New York Mother's Intentional Tort Action Against Farm Owner Barred
Jun 24, 2020

Should Employers Consider Special Release Agreements Before Distributing New Laptops?

Building on an earlier decision, discussed here, a federal district court sitting in Illinois held, in relevant part, that an action filed by an employee against an employer pursuant to...

Should Employers Consider Special Release Agreements Before Distributing New Laptops? Should Employers Consider Special Release Agreements Before Distributing New Laptops?
Jun 22, 2020

Supreme Court of Georgia Jettisons 85-Year-Old Decision Regarding “Off-the-Clock” Injuries

Jettisoning a decision that had stood for more than 85 years, a divided Supreme Court of Georgia overruled Ocean Acc. & Guar. Corp. v. Farr, 180 Ga. 266 (178 SE...

Supreme Court of Georgia Jettisons 85-Year-Old Decision Regarding “Off-the-Clock” Injuries Supreme Court of Georgia Jettisons 85-Year-Old Decision Regarding “Off-the-Clock” Injuries
Jun 19, 2020

MA Court OKs Division of Workers' Comp Settlement Between Divorcing Couple

In a Massachusetts divorce proceeding, a state appellate court affirmed a decision by a state Probate and Family Court judge that had allocated $50,000 of the husband’s remaining workers’ compensation...

MA Court OKs Division of Workers' Comp Settlement Between Divorcing Couple MA Court OKs Division of Workers' Comp Settlement Between Divorcing Couple
Jun 18, 2020

Virginia Employee's Bowel Disease Tied to Puncture Wound in Foot

In a decision not designated for publication, a Virginia appellate court affirmed an award of workers' compensation benefits to a claimant who contended he developed Crohn's colitis — a type...

Virginia Employee's Bowel Disease Tied to Puncture Wound in Foot Virginia Employee's Bowel Disease Tied to Puncture Wound in Foot
Jun 16, 2020

Utah Court Agrees that Leap from Truck Was Unusual

In another case involving Utah's so-called "Allen standard," under which an employee with a preexisting condition faces a heightened standard for proving legal causation, a state appellate court affirmed a...

Utah Court Agrees that Leap from Truck Was Unusual Utah Court Agrees that Leap from Truck Was Unusual
Jun 15, 2020

Texas High Court Shows "Substantially Certain" Rule Differs "Substantially" from State to State

In an opinion that provides perhaps the best discussion of the intentional injury exception to a state’s exclusive remedy rule, the Supreme Court of Texas held that in order for...

Texas High Court Shows "Substantially Certain" Rule Differs "Substantially" from State to State Texas High Court Shows "Substantially Certain" Rule Differs "Substantially" from State to State

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89