Newest Articles

Mar 10, 2026

Second Circuit Bars Medical Marijuana Reimbursement Under the Longshore Act

In Garcia v. Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 6549 (2d Cir. Mar. 5, 2026), the Second Circuit denied a petition for review filed by a...

Second Circuit Bars Medical Marijuana Reimbursement Under the Longshore Act Second Circuit Bars Medical Marijuana Reimbursement Under the Longshore Act
Mar 6, 2026

New York’s Hidden Cost Problem: WCRI Examines the Price of Delivering Benefits

Every dollar spent on workers’ compensation falls into one of two broad categories: benefits paid to injured workers—medical care and wage replacement—and the costs of delivering those benefits. The second...

New York’s Hidden Cost Problem: WCRI Examines the Price of Delivering Benefits New York’s Hidden Cost Problem: WCRI Examines the Price of Delivering Benefits
Mar 5, 2026

Delaware Supreme Court Reinstates IAB’s Denial of Sole Proprietor Coverage

In Motors v. Bayly (Red House Motors d/b/a Bayly’s Garage), 2026 Del. LEXIS 92 (Mar. 2, 2026), the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a Superior Court decision that the high court...

Delaware Supreme Court Reinstates IAB’s Denial of Sole Proprietor Coverage Delaware Supreme Court Reinstates IAB’s Denial of Sole Proprietor Coverage
Mar 3, 2026

Florida Court Invalidates Rules Expanding “Absolute Choice” Pharmacy Provision

In Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 1469 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 25, 2026), the First District Court of Appeal recently held that...

Florida Court Invalidates Rules Expanding “Absolute Choice” Pharmacy Provision Florida Court Invalidates Rules Expanding “Absolute Choice” Pharmacy Provision

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Oct 13, 2020

NY Widow's Death Benefits Claim Filed 12 Years After Work Cessation Not Supported By Medical Evidence

A New York appellate court affirmed a decision by the state's Workers' Compensation Board that denied death benefits to a widow whose husband, a former correction officer, died in 2016,...

NY Widow's Death Benefits Claim Filed 12 Years After Work Cessation Not Supported By Medical Evidence NY Widow's Death Benefits Claim Filed 12 Years After Work Cessation Not Supported By Medical Evidence
Oct 12, 2020

NY Law Firm Requests $52K in Fees, Gets $1K For Failure to Submit Proper Form

A New York appellate court held the state's Workers' Compensation Board did not abuse its discretion in awarding counsel fees of $1,000 to the law firm representing an injured worker...

NY Law Firm Requests $52K in Fees, Gets $1K For Failure to Submit Proper Form NY Law Firm Requests $52K in Fees, Gets $1K For Failure to Submit Proper Form
Oct 8, 2020

Oregon Claimant’s Injury During Unpaid Orientation Session is Compensable

Where a claimant had applied for a position with the purported employer, had been advised by that employer to attend an unpaid “orientation” and a paid training day, had arrived...

Oregon Claimant’s Injury During Unpaid Orientation Session is Compensable Oregon Claimant’s Injury During Unpaid Orientation Session is Compensable
Oct 7, 2020

NY Employer Allowed 10 Percent Credit for Claimant's Prior SLU Injury to Same Leg

A New York appellate court affirmed a decision of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Board that held a claimant was entitled to a 7.5 percent schedule loss of use (“SLU”) of...

NY Employer Allowed 10 Percent Credit for Claimant's Prior SLU Injury to Same Leg NY Employer Allowed 10 Percent Credit for Claimant's Prior SLU Injury to Same Leg
Oct 6, 2020

Correctional Officer's PTSD Claim Fails under NY's Objective Standard of Stress

Reiterating New York’s adherence to an objective, rather than a subjective standard with regard to stress-related claims, a state appellate court affirmed a determination by the state’s Workers’ Compensation Board...

Correctional Officer's PTSD Claim Fails under NY's Objective Standard of Stress Correctional Officer's PTSD Claim Fails under NY's Objective Standard of Stress
Oct 1, 2020

Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Rule Regarding Injuries Stemming From Common Bodily Movements

The Supreme Court of Illinois reversed a decision of the Appellate Court, Workers’ Compensation Division, that in turn had affirmed a denial of benefits to a restaurant sous-chef who sustained...

Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Rule Regarding Injuries Stemming From Common Bodily Movements Illinois Supreme Court Clarifies Rule Regarding Injuries Stemming From Common Bodily Movements
Sep 30, 2020

Wyoming Claim Involving Flesh-Eating Bacteria Not Barred by "Communicable Disease Exclusion"

The Supreme Court of Wyoming held a state district court did not err when it rejected a determination by Office of Administrative Hearings that a worker’s claim for a work-related...

Wyoming Claim Involving Flesh-Eating Bacteria Not Barred by "Communicable Disease Exclusion" Wyoming Claim Involving Flesh-Eating Bacteria Not Barred by "Communicable Disease Exclusion"
Sep 29, 2020

KY Widow Awarded Benefits For Husband's Death More than 10 Years After Injury

The Supreme Court of Kentucky, affirming an earlier decision by the state's Court of Appeals, held a widow was entitled to statutory income benefits under KRS 342.750(1)(a), in spite of...

KY Widow Awarded Benefits For Husband's Death More than 10 Years After Injury KY Widow Awarded Benefits For Husband's Death More than 10 Years After Injury
Sep 28, 2020

Oklahoma High Court Strikes Down Exclusive Remedy Rule for Non-Dependent Parents

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma, reversing a trial court's decision that had, pursuant to 12 O.S. 2011 §§1053A, granted summary judgment, in relevant part, to an employer sued in a...

Oklahoma High Court Strikes Down Exclusive Remedy Rule for Non-Dependent Parents Oklahoma High Court Strikes Down Exclusive Remedy Rule for Non-Dependent Parents
Sep 23, 2020

Illinois Court Says Action for Statutory Damages Under Biometric Act Not Barred by Exclusivity

Falling in line with several federal decisions that had earlier ruled on the issue, an Illinois appellate court held the exclusive remedy provisions of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Act do...

Illinois Court Says Action for Statutory Damages Under Biometric Act Not Barred by Exclusivity Illinois Court Says Action for Statutory Damages Under Biometric Act Not Barred by Exclusivity
Sep 22, 2020

District of Columbia's Public Sector Comp Act Does Not Provide Schedule Benefits for PTSD

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that a public-sector employee may not recover schedule benefits for PTSD pursuant to D.C. Code § 1-623.07 (2016 Repl.) since that statute...

District of Columbia's Public Sector Comp Act Does Not Provide Schedule Benefits for PTSD District of Columbia's Public Sector Comp Act Does Not Provide Schedule Benefits for PTSD
Sep 21, 2020

Michigan Employee's Massage Therapy Was Not Compensable

A Michigan appellate court vacated a ruling by the Michigan Compensation Appellate Commission (MCAC) requiring an employer to reimburse an injured employee for massage therapy services where the services were...

Michigan Employee's Massage Therapy Was Not Compensable Michigan Employee's Massage Therapy Was Not Compensable

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89