Newest Articles

Jun 5, 2026

Iowa Supreme Court: Employer Not Bound by Opinion of Its Own Treating Physician

Many disputes over physician choice in workers’ compensation arise when an injured worker seeks treatment from a doctor of his or her own choosing. Hayes v. Christian Retirement Homes, Inc.,...

Iowa Supreme Court: Employer Not Bound by Opinion of Its Own Treating Physician Iowa Supreme Court: Employer Not Bound by Opinion of Its Own Treating Physician
Jun 2, 2026

Maine Supreme Court: Massachusetts Law Strips Staffing Client of Workers’ Compensation Immunity

Court Applies Massachusetts Law to Maine Injury, Rejects Immunity Defense in Multi-State Staffing Arrangement A New Hampshire contractor that likely would have enjoyed workers’ compensation immunity under Maine law lost...

Maine Supreme Court: Massachusetts Law Strips Staffing Client of Workers’ Compensation Immunity Maine Supreme Court: Massachusetts Law Strips Staffing Client of Workers’ Compensation Immunity
Jun 1, 2026

NY High Court Holds JIWA Bars Collateral Estoppel Effect of Pre-Enactment Workers’ Comp Decisions

New York’s Court of Appeals recently affirmed an Appellate Division order blocking defendants in a personal injury action from using a Workers’ Compensation Board causation determination as collateral estoppel, holding...

NY High Court Holds JIWA Bars Collateral Estoppel Effect of Pre-Enactment Workers’ Comp Decisions NY High Court Holds JIWA Bars Collateral Estoppel Effect of Pre-Enactment Workers’ Comp Decisions
May 27, 2026

Nebraska Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Death Benefits Where Work Injury Delayed Cancer Treatment

In a case involving a Nebraska truck driver-farm laborer whose treatment for metastatic cancer was allegedly postponed by complications associated with a compensable hip injury and its resulting treatment, the...

Nebraska Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Death Benefits Where Work Injury Delayed Cancer Treatment Nebraska Supreme Court Affirms Denial of Death Benefits Where Work Injury Delayed Cancer Treatment

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Oct 19, 2021

Subrogated Georgia Insurer Has No Fiduciary Duty to Protect Injured Employee’s Interests

OCGA § 34-9-11.1, Georgia’s statute that gives the insurer (or employer) the right to “assert the employee’s cause of action in tort” against a third party or parties if the...

Subrogated Georgia Insurer Has No Fiduciary Duty to Protect Injured Employee’s Interests Subrogated Georgia Insurer Has No Fiduciary Duty to Protect Injured Employee’s Interests
Oct 18, 2021

MN Supreme Court Says No to Mandatory Reimbursement for Medical Marijuana

In two companion decisions, a divided Supreme Court of Minnesota held that the state’s Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (WCCA) lacks jurisdiction to decide whether federal law preempts Minnesota law...

MN Supreme Court Says No to Mandatory Reimbursement for Medical Marijuana MN Supreme Court Says No to Mandatory Reimbursement for Medical Marijuana
Oct 15, 2021

New Hampshire High Court Adopts “Chain-of-Causation Test” for Suicides

In a case of first impression, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, adopted the “chain-of-causation test” for suicides and affirmed a decision by the state’s Compensation Appeals Board (CAB) that...

New Hampshire High Court Adopts “Chain-of-Causation Test” for Suicides New Hampshire High Court Adopts “Chain-of-Causation Test” for Suicides
Oct 12, 2021

Failure of Injured NY Worker to Disclose Auto Accident to IME Physician Results in Loss of Benefits

The New York Workers’ Compensation Board was within its powers when it found an injured worker had violated N.Y. Workers’ Comp. Law § 114-a, by failing to disclose on an...

Failure of Injured NY Worker to Disclose Auto Accident to IME Physician Results in Loss of Benefits Failure of Injured NY Worker to Disclose Auto Accident to IME Physician Results in Loss of Benefits
Oct 11, 2021

NY Worker Barred From Future Benefits Even After Paying Comp Insurer $63K From Settlement Proceeds

Despite the fact that a workers’ compensation insurer was aware of an injured worker’s third-party action against the driver of a motor vehicle, and even received and accepted more than...

NY Worker Barred From Future Benefits Even After Paying Comp Insurer $63K From Settlement Proceeds NY Worker Barred From Future Benefits Even After Paying Comp Insurer $63K From Settlement Proceeds
Oct 5, 2021

West Virginia Court Stresses Six-Month Statute of Limitations is Strictly Construed

W. Va. Code 23-4-15(a), which requires workers’ compensation claims to be filed within six months from and after the date of injury or death, as the case may be, is...

West Virginia Court Stresses Six-Month Statute of Limitations is Strictly Construed West Virginia Court Stresses Six-Month Statute of Limitations is Strictly Construed
Oct 4, 2021

Florida JCC Errs in Failing to Appoint EMA to Resolve Medical Dispute

Where a Florida workers’ compensation claimant disagreed with the medical opinion of the employer/carrier’s authorized physician, sought a one-time change in physicians pursuant to § 440.13(2)(f), Fla. Stat., saw a...

Florida JCC Errs in Failing to Appoint EMA to Resolve Medical Dispute Florida JCC Errs in Failing to Appoint EMA to Resolve Medical Dispute
Oct 1, 2021

Wisconsin Court Says UIM Carrier May Not Deduct Comp Benefits Subject to Subrogation Lien

A Wisconsin appellate court held that a deceased worker’s automobile insurance carrier, which had written a policy that included underinsured motorist’s (UIM) limits of $250,000, may only reduce its coverage...

Wisconsin Court Says UIM Carrier May Not Deduct Comp Benefits Subject to Subrogation Lien Wisconsin Court Says UIM Carrier May Not Deduct Comp Benefits Subject to Subrogation Lien
Sep 30, 2021

Ohio Claimant Disqualified from TTD Because She Gave Two-Week Notice Four Days Before Injury

An Ohio appellate court recently reversed a state Commission’s decision that had awarded TTD benefits to an employee who gave his employer a two-week notice that she intended to leave...

Ohio Claimant Disqualified from TTD Because She Gave Two-Week Notice Four Days Before Injury Ohio Claimant Disqualified from TTD Because She Gave Two-Week Notice Four Days Before Injury
Sep 28, 2021

Illinois Court Nixes Jurisdiction When Injury and Employment Contract Were in Indiana

In an unpublished decision, an Illinois appellate court reversed a decision of a county circuit court confirming an award of workers’ compensation benefits by the state’s Workers’ Compensation Commission on...

Illinois Court Nixes Jurisdiction When Injury and Employment Contract Were in Indiana Illinois Court Nixes Jurisdiction When Injury and Employment Contract Were in Indiana
Sep 27, 2021

South Dakota Court “Borrows” Going and Coming Rule for Negligence Action

The Supreme Court of South Dakota recently affirmed a trial court’s decision that granted summary judgment to a municipality and a volunteer fire department on the basis that the department’s...

South Dakota Court “Borrows” Going and Coming Rule for Negligence Action South Dakota Court “Borrows” Going and Coming Rule for Negligence Action
Sep 24, 2021

Iowa Court Affirms PPD Award Where Effects of Knee Injury Extended Beyond the Leg

Stressing that a claimant’s “injury” and “impairment” are not necessarily equivalents, an Iowa appellate court affirmed a determination that an injured worker was entitled to permanent partial disability benefits; he...

Iowa Court Affirms PPD Award Where Effects of Knee Injury Extended Beyond the Leg Iowa Court Affirms PPD Award Where Effects of Knee Injury Extended Beyond the Leg

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89