Newest Articles

Oct 7, 2026

Two Boxes Checked “No”

LA Second Circuit Affirms Forfeiture for False Answers on Pre-Hire Questionnaires About Prior Work Accidents and a Recommended Surgery Louisiana’s Second Circuit Court of Appeal has affirmed a ruling that...

Two Boxes Checked “No” Two Boxes Checked “No”
Oct 5, 2026

Louisiana Court: Paid a Percentage, Still an Employee

LA Fourth Circuit, 3–2, Holds Dump-Truck Driver Paid 25% of Truck Earnings Was an Employee Despite 1099; Dissent Invokes Manifest-Error Review The Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit recently reversed...

Louisiana Court: Paid a Percentage, Still an Employee Louisiana Court: Paid a Percentage, Still an Employee
Sep 29, 2026

Alcohol Falls Outside KY’s Presumption of Causation

KY Supreme Court Holds the Statutory Presumption Against Recovery for Intoxicating Substances Does Not Apply to Alcohol The Kentucky Supreme Court has affirmed benefits for a traffic flagger who was...

Alcohol Falls Outside KY’s Presumption of Causation Alcohol Falls Outside KY’s Presumption of Causation
Sep 28, 2026

The Heart Has Wiring, Too

FL First DCA Holds Harlem’s Narrow “Heart Disease” Definition Does Not Bar a Firefighter’s Arrhythmia Claim Under the Heart-Lung Presumption Florida’s First District Court of Appeal has affirmed an award...

The Heart Has Wiring, Too The Heart Has Wiring, Too

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Oct 26, 2022

Florida’s Special Firefighter Cancer Statute Cannot Be Applied Retroactively

Florida’s special firefighter statute, § 112.1816, Fla. Stat., which provides previously unavailable benefits—a one-time payment of $25,000, and full coverage of the firefighter’s cancer treatment—to firefighters who meet certain criteria...

Florida’s Special Firefighter Cancer Statute Cannot Be Applied Retroactively Florida’s Special Firefighter Cancer Statute Cannot Be Applied Retroactively
Oct 25, 2022

FL Condo Association Was Statutory Employer of Valet Service Employee and Immune from Tort Liability

Because a condominium association had a contractual obligation to provide valet services to the condominium owners pursuant to the terms of the declaration of condominium, the association was the statutory...

FL Condo Association Was Statutory Employer of Valet Service Employee and Immune from Tort Liability FL Condo Association Was Statutory Employer of Valet Service Employee and Immune from Tort Liability
Oct 20, 2022

NM Court Limits Cannabis Reimbursement to Amount Set in Fee Schedule

In an unpublished opinion, the Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed a decision by a state workers’ compensation judge that denied an injured worker’s request for full reimbursement of...

NM Court Limits Cannabis Reimbursement to Amount Set in Fee Schedule NM Court Limits Cannabis Reimbursement to Amount Set in Fee Schedule
Oct 18, 2022

Extension of Statute of Limitations in Ohio R. C. 4123.28 Does Not Apply to Death Claims

In a divided opinion, an Ohio appellate court affirmed a decision of a state trial court that granted summary judgment to an employer in a death benefits case that had...

Extension of Statute of Limitations in Ohio R. C. 4123.28 Does Not Apply to Death Claims Extension of Statute of Limitations in Ohio R. C. 4123.28 Does Not Apply to Death Claims
Oct 13, 2022

Bankruptcy Court Nixes WI Claimant’s Effort to Avoid Paying Med Providers

Where a Wisconsin worker settled a contested workers’ compensation claim with his employer and its insurer by means of a compromise settlement agreement that called for the payment of $120,000 to the claimant, $30,000....

Bankruptcy Court Nixes WI Claimant’s Effort to Avoid Paying Med Providers Bankruptcy Court Nixes WI Claimant’s Effort to Avoid Paying Med Providers
Oct 13, 2022

Opinion Mondays: As to AMA Guides, is There an Alternative to Protz?

In a decision that may have slipped beneath the radar of insurers, administrators, and attorneys whose work is not directly impacted by the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act [33 U.S.C.S §§ 901, et seq.] (“the Act” or “the Longshore Act”), and yet which, as I argue below...

Opinion Mondays: As to AMA Guides, is There an Alternative to Protz? Opinion Mondays: As to AMA Guides, is There an Alternative to Protz?
Oct 13, 2022

Opinion Mondays: The AMA is on Another Collision Course With Protz

The first session at tomorrow afternoon's (August 18, 2020) virtual conference, sponsored by Workers' Compensation Institute, has really piqued my interest. Entitled, "THE NEW AMA Guides®" (hereinafter "the Guides"), it begs the question: "When will the 7th Edition of the Guides be released?"....

Opinion Mondays: The AMA is on Another Collision Course With Protz Opinion Mondays: The AMA is on Another Collision Course With Protz
Oct 11, 2022

No Violation of N.Y. Workers’ Comp. Law § 114-a Where Testimony Inconsistencies Explained by Head Injury

A New York appellate court affirmed a finding of a state WCLJ, affirmed by the New York Workers’ Compensation Board, that a claimant had not made misrepresentations regarding his prior...

No Violation of N.Y. Workers’ Comp. Law § 114-a Where Testimony Inconsistencies Explained by Head Injury No Violation of N.Y. Workers’ Comp. Law § 114-a Where Testimony Inconsistencies Explained by Head Injury
Oct 4, 2022

NY Claimant Entitled to Marked Permanent Disability Award Instead of SLU Award

Construing the N.Y. Workers’ Compensation Guidelines for Determining Impairment, a state appellate court affirmed a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board that held an injured employee’s foot injury was not...

NY Claimant Entitled to Marked Permanent Disability Award Instead of SLU Award NY Claimant Entitled to Marked Permanent Disability Award Instead of SLU Award
Oct 3, 2022

Failure to Disclose Earnings From Home-Based Business is Violation of NY Fraud Statute

Where a New York workers’ compensation claimant testified that he had not worked after a specific date and also represented to a carrier’s medical consultant that he had stopped working...

Failure to Disclose Earnings From Home-Based Business is Violation of NY Fraud Statute Failure to Disclose Earnings From Home-Based Business is Violation of NY Fraud Statute
Sep 29, 2022

Injuries Sustained by MS Worker in Fight Over Country Music Not Compensable

In a case with a bizarre fact pattern, a Mississippi appellate court affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits to a worker who sustained injuries in a workplace altercation [Hollis...

Injuries Sustained by MS Worker in Fight Over Country Music Not Compensable Injuries Sustained by MS Worker in Fight Over Country Music Not Compensable
Sep 27, 2022

NC Court Affirms Death Benefits Award Under State’s “Found Dead” Presumption

The Court of Appeals of North Carolina, construing the state’s version of the “found dead” rule, affirmed a decision by the state’s Industrial Commission that awarded death benefits to the...

NC Court Affirms Death Benefits Award Under State’s “Found Dead” Presumption NC Court Affirms Death Benefits Award Under State’s “Found Dead” Presumption

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89