Newest Articles

Oct 5, 2026

Louisiana Court: Paid a Percentage, Still an Employee

LA Fourth Circuit, 3–2, Holds Dump-Truck Driver Paid 25% of Truck Earnings Was an Employee Despite 1099; Dissent Invokes Manifest-Error Review The Louisiana Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit recently reversed...

Louisiana Court: Paid a Percentage, Still an Employee Louisiana Court: Paid a Percentage, Still an Employee
Sep 29, 2026

Alcohol Falls Outside KY’s Presumption of Causation

KY Supreme Court Holds the Statutory Presumption Against Recovery for Intoxicating Substances Does Not Apply to Alcohol The Kentucky Supreme Court has affirmed benefits for a traffic flagger who was...

Alcohol Falls Outside KY’s Presumption of Causation Alcohol Falls Outside KY’s Presumption of Causation
Sep 28, 2026

The Heart Has Wiring, Too

FL First DCA Holds Harlem’s Narrow “Heart Disease” Definition Does Not Bar a Firefighter’s Arrhythmia Claim Under the Heart-Lung Presumption Florida’s First District Court of Appeal has affirmed an award...

The Heart Has Wiring, Too The Heart Has Wiring, Too
Sep 24, 2026

“Closed” Under Old Rules, Reprocessed Under New

Oregon Court Applies New Claim-Closure Requirements to Case Pending on Judicial Review The Oregon Court of Appeals has held that 2022 amendments limiting retroactive “medically stationary” determinations apply to a...

“Closed” Under Old Rules, Reprocessed Under New “Closed” Under Old Rules, Reprocessed Under New

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Oct 21, 2024

Kansas Court Affirms Out-of-State Injury Compensable Under Kansas Comp Act

Last Friday, the Kansas Court of Appeals affirmed a decision of the state’s Workers Compensation Board awarding additional benefits under the Kansas Workers’ Compensation Act to a nurse who moved...

Kansas Court Affirms Out-of-State Injury Compensable Under Kansas Comp Act Kansas Court Affirms Out-of-State Injury Compensable Under Kansas Comp Act
Oct 21, 2024

PA Court Says IRE Physicians Should Consider Conditions Beyond Accepted Injury Description

Last Thursday, the Commonwealth Court affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board’s ruling that rejected a physician's impairment rating evaluation (IRE) because the physician had failed to consider conditions beyond the...

PA Court Says IRE Physicians Should Consider Conditions Beyond Accepted Injury Description PA Court Says IRE Physicians Should Consider Conditions Beyond Accepted Injury Description
Oct 15, 2024

Ohio’s Firefighter Cancer Presumption is Difficult to Rebut

In a recent decision that closely mirrors an earlier case, the Ohio Court of Appeals (Tenth Appellate District) has further solidified the strength of statutory presumptions favoring firefighters in cancer-related...

Ohio’s Firefighter Cancer Presumption is Difficult to Rebut Ohio’s Firefighter Cancer Presumption is Difficult to Rebut
Oct 14, 2024

NY Worker’s Claim Found Compensable Despite Severe Intoxication

In a decision that emphasizes the high bar for denying workers’ compensation claims in New York based on employee intoxication, a state appellate court recently affirmed a ruling by the...

NY Worker’s Claim Found Compensable Despite Severe Intoxication NY Worker’s Claim Found Compensable Despite Severe Intoxication
Oct 11, 2024

NY Court Affirms COVID-19 Death Benefits for Paratransit Operator

New York’s De Facto “Prevalence” Approach In a decision that further clarifies New York’s approach to COVID-19 workers’ compensation claims, the Appellate Division, Third Department, has affirmed an award of...

NY Court Affirms COVID-19 Death Benefits for Paratransit Operator NY Court Affirms COVID-19 Death Benefits for Paratransit Operator
Oct 10, 2024

Arkansas Court Rejects Use of “Going and Coming” Rule in Tort Case

Yesterday, in Skala v. Comfort Sys. USA, Inc. Comfort Sys. USA Ark., Inc., 2024 Ark. App. LEXIS 522 (Oct. 9, 2024), the Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed a circuit court’s...

Arkansas Court Rejects Use of “Going and Coming” Rule in Tort Case Arkansas Court Rejects Use of “Going and Coming” Rule in Tort Case
Oct 8, 2024

Georgia: Workplace Shooting Did not Arise Out of Employment

Wrongful Death Action Against Employer May Proceed In a case with a rather bizarre fact pattern involving an all-too-common workplace tragedy—a fatal shooting—the Georgia Court of Appeals has reversed a...

Georgia: Workplace Shooting Did not Arise Out of Employment Georgia: Workplace Shooting Did not Arise Out of Employment
Oct 7, 2024

NY Claimant’s “Personal Experience” Doesn’t Make Him a Medical Expert

A New York appellate court recently rejected a claimant’s attempt to establish himself as a medical expert based on his personal experience with multiple medical procedures and online research [DiPippo...

NY Claimant’s “Personal Experience” Doesn’t Make Him a Medical Expert NY Claimant’s “Personal Experience” Doesn’t Make Him a Medical Expert
Oct 3, 2024

Colorado: Injured Employee May Proceed Against Employer’s UM/UIM Carrier

Answering a question certified to it by the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, the Supreme Court of Colorado held that an employee who receives workers’ compensation benefits...

Colorado: Injured Employee May Proceed Against Employer’s UM/UIM Carrier Colorado: Injured Employee May Proceed Against Employer’s UM/UIM Carrier
Oct 3, 2024

Maine High Court Clarifies When Interest on Specific-Loss Benefits Begins to Accrue for Specific Eye Injuries

In a well-reasoned decision that illustrates the difficulties courts sometime face in balancing competing interests within a workers’ compensation dispute, the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine recently held that when...

Maine High Court Clarifies When Interest on Specific-Loss Benefits Begins to Accrue for Specific Eye Injuries Maine High Court Clarifies When Interest on Specific-Loss Benefits Begins to Accrue for Specific Eye Injuries
Oct 2, 2024

Nebraska High Court: Expert’s Use of “Associated” Was Sufficient to Establish Causation

The Supreme Court of Nebraska recently affirmed an award of benefits to a claimant who alleged respiratory injuries from wearing a UV-sterilized N95 mask at work [Prinz v. Omaha Operations...

Nebraska High Court: Expert’s Use of “Associated” Was Sufficient to Establish Causation Nebraska High Court: Expert’s Use of “Associated” Was Sufficient to Establish Causation
Sep 30, 2024

NY: Google Employee’s Post-Happy Hour Accident Arose From Employment

The Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently affirmed a state Workers’ Compensation Board decision finding that a Google account executive’s injuries sustained after leaving a...

NY: Google Employee’s Post-Happy Hour Accident Arose From Employment NY: Google Employee’s Post-Happy Hour Accident Arose From Employment

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89