Newest Articles

Aug 20, 2026

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day

Driscoll Agrees with the Larson Standard, Then Affirms Without Needing It The Iowa Court of Appeals has affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits to a city employee who developed...

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day
Aug 20, 2026

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day

Driscoll Agrees with the Larson Standard, Then Affirms Without Needing It The Iowa Court of Appeals has affirmed the denial of workers’ compensation benefits to a city employee who developed...

Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day Issue Commentary: Iowa Looks at Vaccine‑Injury Compensability—and Leaves the Real Question for Another Day
Aug 19, 2026

VA: One Basket, Two Injuries—and Only One Compensable Accident

In *Sairafianpour v. Loudoun County Public Schools*, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 430 (Aug. 11, 2026), the Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a Workers’ Compensation Commission decision awarding medical benefits...

VA: One Basket, Two Injuries—and Only One Compensable Accident VA: One Basket, Two Injuries—and Only One Compensable Accident
Aug 17, 2026

UT Supreme Court Affirms PTD Award—and Rejects Employer’s Claim to Employee’s Debt-Collection Settlement

In Granite School District v. Young, 2026 UT 29, 2026 Utah LEXIS 113 (Aug. 13, 2026), the Utah Supreme Court affirmed an award of permanent total disability benefits to a...

UT Supreme Court Affirms PTD Award—and Rejects Employer’s Claim to Employee’s Debt-Collection Settlement UT Supreme Court Affirms PTD Award—and Rejects Employer’s Claim to Employee’s Debt-Collection Settlement

All Articles

ARCHIVE
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
Sep 29, 2025

First Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Puerto Rico Retaliation Case

In Mercado v. Hyannis Air Service, Inc., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 24455 (1st Cir. Sept. 22, 2025), the First Circuit vacated a district court’s grant of summary judgment in a...

First Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Puerto Rico Retaliation Case First Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Puerto Rico Retaliation Case
Sep 26, 2025

NY Court Reverses Employment Classification Decision in Construction Injury Case

A New York appellate court has reversed a Workers’ Compensation Board decision that classified an injured construction worker as an employee, holding that the Board failed to apply the statutory...

NY Court Reverses Employment Classification Decision in Construction Injury Case NY Court Reverses Employment Classification Decision in Construction Injury Case
Sep 25, 2025

Ohio Supreme Court Affirms VSSR Award for Roofer’s Fall Through Skylight

The Ohio Supreme Court has upheld additional workers’ compensation benefits for a roofer injured in a fall, holding that merely transporting safety equipment to a jobsite does not satisfy fall-protection...

Ohio Supreme Court Affirms VSSR Award for Roofer’s Fall Through Skylight Ohio Supreme Court Affirms VSSR Award for Roofer’s Fall Through Skylight
Sep 23, 2025

Kentucky High Court Upholds Use of Disability Guidelines to Deny Long-Term Opioid Coverage

The Kentucky Supreme Court has ruled that the state’s Official Disability Guidelines (ODG) can be applied retroactively to deny workers’ compensation coverage for treatments that were previously deemed compensable for...

Kentucky High Court Upholds Use of Disability Guidelines to Deny Long-Term Opioid Coverage Kentucky High Court Upholds Use of Disability Guidelines to Deny Long-Term Opioid Coverage
Sep 19, 2025

GA Court Preserves Tort Rights Despite Workers’ Comp Settlement

The Georgia Court of Appeals has ruled that workers’ compensation settlements cannot generally bar separate tort claims when the parties expressly preserve those rights in writing. In Pierre v. MICRO-JA/X,...

GA Court Preserves Tort Rights Despite Workers’ Comp Settlement GA Court Preserves Tort Rights Despite Workers’ Comp Settlement
Sep 17, 2025

The Derivative Nature of Wrongful Death Claims Proves Decisive

The Mississippi Supreme Court, stressing the derivative nature of wrongful death actions, held that because a school resource officer for a county school district would have been barred—on exclusive remedy...

The Derivative Nature of Wrongful Death Claims Proves Decisive The Derivative Nature of Wrongful Death Claims Proves Decisive
Sep 16, 2025

PA Court Clarifies Timing Requirements for Out-of-State Workers’ Compensation Claims

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court addressed a critical procedural question for the state’s Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund in Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund v. Aguilar, 2025 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 162 (Sept. 9,...

PA Court Clarifies Timing Requirements for Out-of-State Workers’ Compensation Claims PA Court Clarifies Timing Requirements for Out-of-State Workers’ Compensation Claims
Sep 15, 2025

Oklahoma Supreme Court Clarifies “Active Pursuit” Requirement for Workers’ Compensation Claims

The Oklahoma Supreme Court recently delivered a significant ruling for employers in Obi Holding Co. v. Schultz-Butzbach, 2025 OK 55 (Sept. 9, 2025), clarifying that workers’ compensation claimants must continuously...

Oklahoma Supreme Court Clarifies “Active Pursuit” Requirement for Workers’ Compensation Claims Oklahoma Supreme Court Clarifies “Active Pursuit” Requirement for Workers’ Compensation Claims
Sep 10, 2025

Virginia Court Rejects Extended Premises Claim for Crosswalk Injury

The Virginia Court of Appeals has ruled that a public street crosswalk between a parking garage and hospital entrance did not constitute an employer’s “extended premises” under workers’ compensation law...

Virginia Court Rejects Extended Premises Claim for Crosswalk Injury Virginia Court Rejects Extended Premises Claim for Crosswalk Injury
Sep 9, 2025

Florida: EMA Opinions May Not Be Excluded under Daubert Standards

In a case of first impression, the Florida First District Court of Appeal has held that Expert Medical Advisor (EMA) reports and testimony in workers’ compensation proceedings must be admitted...

Florida: EMA Opinions May Not Be Excluded under Daubert Standards Florida: EMA Opinions May Not Be Excluded under Daubert Standards
Sep 8, 2025

ID Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Authority Over Workers’ Compensation Exception Claims

The Idaho Supreme Court has ruled that district courts retain subject matter jurisdiction over claims alleging employer “willful or unprovoked physical aggression” under Idaho Code § 72-209(3), even when a...

ID Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Authority Over Workers’ Compensation Exception Claims ID Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdictional Authority Over Workers’ Compensation Exception Claims
Sep 3, 2025

Corporate Veil Protects Texas Business Owner From Tort When Employee Suffers Farm Injury

In Lilly v. Weisinger, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 6851 (Aug. 28, 2025), a Texas appellate court held that the exclusive remedy provision of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Act barred a...

Corporate Veil Protects Texas Business Owner From Tort When Employee Suffers Farm Injury Corporate Veil Protects Texas Business Owner From Tort When Employee Suffers Farm Injury

New Comments

  • ramivou: They hid behind a flawed "reading" of this statute for a decade. I am glad the SC finally put an end to the misconception that it was a "first six months only" filing requirement, rather than an ongoing responsibility.
  • trob: Thanks for the query. New York's going and coming doctrine is similar to that in place in the majority of jurisdictions. That is to say that for employees with a fixed place of work and who are on a relatively consistent work schedule, the commute to and from the residence is outside the course and scope of the employment. Often overlooked is the fact that the employee must generally have a fixed ...
  • ramivou: Is coming and going covered in NY?
  • trob: Excellent question. My thought is that the employer was following what it assumed was the typical practice of seeking to protect its "subrogation" interest in state court; in virtually all jurisdictions, the state trial courts are where subrogation issues are litigated. What differed here, of course, was that it wasn't a standard subrogation case, i.e., the employee's work-related injury wasn't ca...
  • ramivou: Why didn't they file it with the state Commission instead?
  • Thomas A. Robinson: I suspect that ACME could seek contractual indemnity, as you note, either from the staffing agency or its carrier. The goal of the Board or agency generally is to see to the proper award of benefits for compensable injuries. Allowing the "aggrieved" parties to sort it out later is completely consistent with the overall theory of workers' compensation. Many thanks for the comment. Best wishes.
  • Barry Stinson: I wonder if Acme's insurer could seek contractural indemnity from Variety's insurer outside of the WC system.
  • Michael C. Duff: The conceptual distinction is between joint causation and presumptive single causation.
  • Thomas A. Robinson: Sorry, I don't/can't provide legal advice. Best wishes, however.
  • Ken Smith: What can I do when my attorney blows my case with an incomplete RB89