A North Carolina worker, who alleged that he was negligently diagnosed and treated by his employer’s plant nurse after suffering a stroke at work, may proceed in tort against that...
NC Worker May Proceed in Tort Against Employer and Plant Nurse for Negligent Treatment NC Worker May Proceed in Tort Against Employer and Plant Nurse for Negligent TreatmentOn Tuesday of this week, the Supreme Court of Rhode Island affirmed a determination by a state trial court that granted summary judgment, on exclusive remedy grounds [see R.I. Gen....
Rhode Island’s Exclusive Remedy Rule Shields Worker Who Engaged in Dangerous Horseplay Rhode Island’s Exclusive Remedy Rule Shields Worker Who Engaged in Dangerous HorseplayLandlord Could Not Implead Tenant/Employer In Injured Employee’s Suit Where Employer Was Not Negligent The exclusive remedy provision of the Delaware Workers’ Compensation Act [Del. Code Ann. tit. 19, §...
Exclusive Remedy Defense Protects Some Employers In Spite of Express Indemnification Agreement Exclusive Remedy Defense Protects Some Employers In Spite of Express Indemnification AgreementThe administrator of the estate of an Illinois employee killed in a work-related vehicular accident may not utilize the state’s “One Day Rest in Seven Act” (“ODRA”)[820 Ill. Comp. Stat....
Plaintiff May Not Use Illinois’ “One Day in Rest Act” to Subvert Exclusive Remedy of State’s Workers’ Compensation Act Plaintiff May Not Use Illinois’ “One Day in Rest Act” to Subvert Exclusive Remedy of State’s Workers’ Compensation ActRestrictive “Mental-Mental” Coverage in State’s Comp Act Opens Door to Potential Liability In a case with a bizarre fact pattern, a King County (Washington) public defender, who contended that she...
Washington Public Defender May Be Able to Recover in Tort for Work-Related PTSD Washington Public Defender May Be Able to Recover in Tort for Work-Related PTSDPost-Mortem Shows Marijuana, Fentanyl, and Alcohol in Deceased Employee’s System In what appears to be the first case of its kind—an action filed against an employer for its allegedly inadequate...
Ohio Widow’s Action Against Ford for Failure to Implement Substance Abuse Policy is Barred by Exclusivity Defense Ohio Widow’s Action Against Ford for Failure to Implement Substance Abuse Policy is Barred by Exclusivity DefenseIn a split decision, the Supreme Court of Minnesota held that an employee, who sustained a work-related injury and who was receiving workers’ compensation benefits, may proceed against his employer...
Claim Under Minnesota’s Human Rights Act Not Barred by Exclusive Remedy Rule Claim Under Minnesota’s Human Rights Act Not Barred by Exclusive Remedy RuleConstruing Kentucky’s “up-the-ladder” statutory employer framework, a state appellate court recently reiterated that workers' compensation immunity is extended to contractors—those who contract with another to have work performed of a...
“Regular” or “Recurrent” is Key to Statutory Employer Issue in Kentucky “Regular” or “Recurrent” is Key to Statutory Employer Issue in Kentucky$14 Million Verdict Stands, Worker’s Duties, Although “Essential,” Were Not Part of Defendant’s Business In a South Carolina wrongful death action, the state’s Court of Appeals recently affirmed a trial...
SC Court Affirms Finding That Maintenance Worker Was Not Statutory Employee of Manufacturer SC Court Affirms Finding That Maintenance Worker Was Not Statutory Employee of ManufacturerThe grant of immunity afforded to subcontractors enrolled in an Ohio contractor’s self-insurance plan [see Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 4123.35(O)] from claims by employees of another enrolled subcontractor does...
Immunity Afforded to Ohio Subcontractors Under Contractor’s Self-Insurance Plan is Constitutional Immunity Afforded to Ohio Subcontractors Under Contractor’s Self-Insurance Plan is ConstitutionalA provision of the Massachusetts Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 152, § 75B(2), and not the common law, affords an employee who was injured on the job...
Massachusetts Retaliatory Discharge Statute Protects Employee’s Right to Sue Employer in Tort Massachusetts Retaliatory Discharge Statute Protects Employee’s Right to Sue Employer in TortReiterating the important rule in New York, that where the availability of workers’ compensation benefits hinges upon questions of fact or upon mixed questions of fact and law, the parties...
New York: Board—Not the Trial Court—Must Determine if Worker Was Independent Contractor New York: Board—Not the Trial Court—Must Determine if Worker Was Independent Contractor