In a meticulous and well-reasoned opinion weighing and discussing multiple issues, the Supreme Court of Idaho held that the state’s Industrial Commission committed error when it ruled that the claimant’s...
120-Pound Weight Gain Might (or Might Not) Sink Idaho Worker’s Aggravation Claim 120-Pound Weight Gain Might (or Might Not) Sink Idaho Worker’s Aggravation ClaimThe Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held a WCJ appropriately relied upon the medical opinion of the employer’s examining physician in which the doctor opined that the workers’ compensation claimant had made...
PA Claimant’s Benefits Terminated: 18 Months of Home Remedies Did Not Constitute Medical Treatment PA Claimant’s Benefits Terminated: 18 Months of Home Remedies Did Not Constitute Medical TreatmentNegligent post-injury conduct, such as exceeding the lifting restrictions placed on an injured employee’s activity cannot, in and of itself, constitute an independent intervening cause that would relieve the original...
Original TN Employer Liable for Medical Care in Spite of Employee’s Violation of Lifting Limits Original TN Employer Liable for Medical Care in Spite of Employee’s Violation of Lifting LimitsAn Ohio appellate court reversed a trial court’s determination that an injured worker had not sustained a compensable mental injury–Depressive Disorder, not otherwise specified–stemming from her original 2007 knee injury,...
Foreseeability of Ohio Worker's Depression is Not a Factor in Judging Compensability of Mental Condition Foreseeability of Ohio Worker's Depression is Not a Factor in Judging Compensability of Mental ConditionIn a decision that illustrates the difficulty that many employers will face if their state has adopted a presumption of compensability in COVID-19 cases, the District of Columbia Court of...
Opinion Mondays: D.C. Stroke Case Shows Fighting COVID-19 Presumptions is Going to Be Up-Hill Battle Opinion Mondays: D.C. Stroke Case Shows Fighting COVID-19 Presumptions is Going to Be Up-Hill BattleWhere an employer paid for medical services exclusively to treat the compensable injury, but not to treat any additional harm from medical negligence, the employer had no subrogation interest in...
Maryland Employer’s Subrogation Interest Does Not Extend to Employee’s Medical Malpractice Settlement Maryland Employer’s Subrogation Interest Does Not Extend to Employee’s Medical Malpractice SettlementIn an unpublished opinion that illustrates the difficulty in establishing medical causation in many aggravation cases, a Nebraska appellate court affirmed a decision by the state’s Workers’ Compensation Court denying...
Nebraska Claimant Fails to Connect Sinus Cavity Clot to Earlier DVT Nebraska Claimant Fails to Connect Sinus Cavity Clot to Earlier DVTA Georgia employee’s negligence claim against his employer for allegedly denying him access to medical care and insurance coverage following an injury in a vehicular crash is barred by the...
Georgia Employee May Not Sue Employer for Negligent Denial of Medical Care Following Injury Georgia Employee May Not Sue Employer for Negligent Denial of Medical Care Following InjuryIf It Weren’t For Bad Luck, She’d Have No Luck at All An Oklahoma workers’ compensation claimant is entitled to additional benefits following a bizarre incident in which she sustained...
Oklahoma Claimant Awarded Additional Benefits After Freak Accident at Medical Facility Oklahoma Claimant Awarded Additional Benefits After Freak Accident at Medical FacilityStressing that the weighing of expert medical evidence is the province of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Commission—and not the appellate courts—the Court of Appeals of Mississippi affirmed a decision awarding...
MS Worker’s Staph Infection Was Causally Connected to Epidural Injections for Back Injury MS Worker’s Staph Infection Was Causally Connected to Epidural Injections for Back Injury