A Georgia employee’s negligence claim against his employer for allegedly denying him access to medical care and insurance coverage following an injury in a vehicular crash is barred by the...
Georgia Employee May Not Sue Employer for Negligent Denial of Medical Care Following Injury Georgia Employee May Not Sue Employer for Negligent Denial of Medical Care Following InjuryFinding that both the Oregon Workers’ Compensation Board and the state’s Court of Appeals had erroneously utilized the appropriate legal standard in their attempts to determine whether a bank employee’s...
Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Standard in Unexplained Fall Cases Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Standard in Unexplained Fall CasesLack of Jury Trial and Limited Damages Pass Constitutional Muster Oklahoma’s retaliatory discharge statute [85A O.S.Supp. 2013 § 7], which restricts jurisdiction in relevant instances to the Workers’ Compensation Commission...
Oklahoma’s Retaliatory Discharge Statute Withstands Constitutional Challenge Oklahoma’s Retaliatory Discharge Statute Withstands Constitutional ChallengeA North Carolina worker, who alleged that he was negligently diagnosed and treated by his employer’s plant nurse after suffering a stroke at work, may proceed in tort against that...
NC Worker May Proceed in Tort Against Employer and Plant Nurse for Negligent Treatment NC Worker May Proceed in Tort Against Employer and Plant Nurse for Negligent TreatmentOnce an Idaho claimant has filed a complaint seeking disability benefits, the employer may require her to attend a medical examination under Idaho Code § 72-433, held the Supreme Court...
Idaho Worker Seeking Disability Benefits May Not Avoid Independent Medical Exam Idaho Worker Seeking Disability Benefits May Not Avoid Independent Medical ExamPublic assistance benefits paid to participants in a New York work experience program (WEP) are “wages,” as that term is defined in the state’s Workers’ Compensation Law [N.Y. Workers’ Comp....
NY’s Public Assistance Benefits Are Wages for Purposes of Computing Loss of Use Award NY’s Public Assistance Benefits Are Wages for Purposes of Computing Loss of Use AwardA Virginia appellate court, affirming a decision by the state’s Workers’ Compensation Commission, held that a claimant need only prove her accident caused one “sudden mechanical or structural change” to...
Virginia Court Clarifies “Sudden Mechanical or Structural Change” Requirement Virginia Court Clarifies “Sudden Mechanical or Structural Change” RequirementAn Oregon appellate court, construing a specialized exception to the exclusive remedy provision of the state’s Workers’ Compensation Law, agreed in relevant part with a trial court that the personal...
Oregon Court Says Landlord Employers Are Immune From Tort Liability Oregon Court Says Landlord Employers Are Immune From Tort LiabilityOwner/Employee’s Injuries in Wreck Were Work-Related Despite Fact That Meeting’s Purpose Was Tangential Injuries sustained in an auto accident by the owner/employee of a commercial-vehicle tire changing service as the...
Ohio Court Takes Broad View of “Arising Out of Employment” Ohio Court Takes Broad View of “Arising Out of Employment”In a signficantly divided (5-2) decision, the Supreme Court of Iowa, answering a question certified to it from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, held that,...
Divided Iowa Supreme Court Says TPAs Are Immune from Common Law Bad Faith Claims Divided Iowa Supreme Court Says TPAs Are Immune from Common Law Bad Faith ClaimsPlaintiffs May Not Back Out Because They Didn’t Account for Workers’ Comp Lien and Medicare Set-Aside An open-court stipulation of settlement in a New York trial court is an independent...
Open Court Settlement Stipulation Binds Parties in NY Civil Action Open Court Settlement Stipulation Binds Parties in NY Civil ActionOpinion of Audiologist With Ph.D. Trumps Opinion of M.D. A Missouri appellate court has affirmed a decision of the state’s Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarding permanent partial disability benefits...
Missouri Court Says Medical “Expert” Need Not be an M.D. Missouri Court Says Medical “Expert” Need Not be an M.D.