Throwback Thursday: Bailey v. American General Ins. Co. (1955)

The Case and Its Context The 1955 Texas Supreme Court decision in Bailey v. American General Insurance Co., 154 Tex. 430, 279 S.W.2d 315 (1955), represents a landmark in the…

Sorry! You must be a member to access this content!

Previous Next

Feb 6, 2025

Throwback Thursday: Bailey v. American General Ins. Co. (1955)

The Case and Its Context The 1955 Texas Supreme Court decision in Bailey v. American General Insurance Co., 154 Tex. 430, 279 S.W.2d 315 (1955), represents a landmark in the...

Throwback Thursday: Bailey v. American General Ins. Co. (1955) Throwback Thursday: Bailey v. American General Ins. Co. (1955)

Issue commentary

Jun 9, 2014

Florida Court Says PTSD Patient’s Ability to Communicate Directly With Psychologist is Not “Medical Necessity”

What if an injured worker was legally prevented from discussing his or her medical condition directly with the worker’s doctor, if the worker was required instead to listen to the...

Florida Court Says PTSD Patient’s Ability to Communicate Directly With Psychologist is Not “Medical Necessity” Florida Court Says PTSD Patient’s Ability to Communicate Directly With Psychologist is Not “Medical Necessity”

Case comment

Mar 12, 2024

Issue Commentary: NC Decision Shows Difficult Balancing Required for Lump-Sum Requests

Issue Commentary: NC Decision Shows Difficult Balancing Required for Lump-Sum Requests Issue Commentary: NC Decision Shows Difficult Balancing Required for Lump-Sum Requests

Issue commentary

Nov 16, 2020

Opinion Mondays: COVID-19 and the Going and Coming Rule

Within the community of workers’ compensation professionals, most of our COVID-19 attention has been directed to presumptions of compensability and to the relatively unprecedented awarding of benefits to employees who...

Opinion Mondays: COVID-19 and the Going and Coming Rule Opinion Mondays: COVID-19 and the Going and Coming Rule

Issue commentary