Home > ARTICLES > Oklahoma Supreme Court Clarifies “Active Pursuit” Requirement for Workers’ Compensation Claims

Tags:

Categories:

Case comment

Sep 15, 2025

Oklahoma Supreme Court Clarifies “Active Pursuit” Requirement for Workers’ Compensation Claims

The Oklahoma Supreme Court recently delivered a significant ruling for employers in Obi Holding Co. v. Schultz-Butzbach, 2025 OK 55 (Sept. 9, 2025), clarifying that workers’ compensation claimants must continuously…

Sorry! You must be a member to access this content!

Previous Next

Sep 15, 2025

Oklahoma Supreme Court Clarifies “Active Pursuit” Requirement for Workers’ Compensation Claims

Oklahoma Supreme Court Clarifies “Active Pursuit” Requirement for Workers’ Compensation Claims Oklahoma Supreme Court Clarifies “Active Pursuit” Requirement for Workers’ Compensation Claims

Case comment

Oct 3, 2017

PA Legislative Bill Would Require Use of 6th Edition of AMA Guides

Yesterday (October 2, 2017), a cadre of 29 Pennsylvania legislators introduced a bill—House Bill 1840—that would require physicians to apply the methodology set forth in “the sixth edition” of the...

PA Legislative Bill Would Require Use of 6th Edition of AMA Guides PA Legislative Bill Would Require Use of 6th Edition of AMA Guides

Case comment

May 24, 2021

Employee’s Action Against Employer’s Comp Insurer For Self-Inflicted Gunshot Wound Barred by Exclusivity

In a divided decision, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin affirmed a finding by the state’s Court of Appeals that the exclusive remedy provisions of the Wisconsin Workers’ Compensation Act barred...

Employee’s Action Against Employer’s Comp Insurer For Self-Inflicted Gunshot Wound Barred by Exclusivity Employee’s Action Against Employer’s Comp Insurer For Self-Inflicted Gunshot Wound Barred by Exclusivity

Case comment

Apr 15, 2024

Louisiana Court Says COVID-19 Was Not an Occupational Disease

Louisiana Court Says COVID-19 Was Not an Occupational Disease Louisiana Court Says COVID-19 Was Not an Occupational Disease

Case comment