Home > ARTICLES > California Court Revives Widow’s COVID-19 Suit Against Husband’s Employer

Tags:

California concealment COVID-19 Exclusive Remedy fraudulent concealment tort liability

Categories:

Case comment

Jun 18, 2024

California Court Revives Widow’s COVID-19 Suit Against Husband’s Employer

glasses on the desk

Yesterday, in a decision analyzing and reiterating California’s fraudulent concealment exception to workers’ compensation exclusivity, the Court of Appeal of California (Second Appellate District) reversed the dismissal of a widow’s...

Sorry! You must be a member to access this content!

Previous Next

Related Articles

Jun 18, 2024

California Court Revives Widow’s COVID-19 Suit Against Husband’s Employer

California Court Revives Widow’s COVID-19 Suit Against Husband’s Employer California Court Revives Widow’s COVID-19 Suit Against Husband’s Employer

Case comment

Mar 9, 2017

S.C. Supreme Court Says Return to Work Insufficient to Rebut Presumption of PTD Where Impairment to Back is Greater Than 50 Percent

Yesterday, in a divided decision, the Supreme Court of South Carolina, overruling an earlier decision of the state’s Court of Appeals, held that evidence of subsequent employment is insufficient by...

S.C. Supreme Court Says Return to Work Insufficient to Rebut Presumption of PTD Where Impairment to Back is Greater Than 50 Percent S.C. Supreme Court Says Return to Work Insufficient to Rebut Presumption of PTD Where Impairment to Back is Greater Than 50 Percent

Case comment

Dec 19, 2011

New Hampshire: Mental Injury Following Business Failure Is Not Compensable Injury

As is the case in a majority of states, mental injuries, including major depression caused by work-related stress, may qualify as compensable injuries in New Hampshire [N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann...

New Hampshire: Mental Injury Following Business Failure Is Not Compensable Injury New Hampshire: Mental Injury Following Business Failure Is Not Compensable Injury

Case comment

May 5, 2014

After Florida’s Adoption of Daubert Rule, Physician’s Opinion as to Cause of Employee’s Placental Abruption Was Inadmissible

Noting that with its 2013 amendment to § 90.702, Fla. Stat., the Florida legislature had clearly jettisoned both “the Frye test” and the “pure opinion” rule [Flannagan v. State, 625...

After Florida’s Adoption of Daubert Rule, Physician’s Opinion as to Cause of Employee’s Placental Abruption Was Inadmissible After Florida’s Adoption of Daubert Rule, Physician’s Opinion as to Cause of Employee’s Placental Abruption Was Inadmissible

Case comment